Example? I wouldn't think that any serious article about the technology would fail to spell out the acronym.
It's common to spell out the acronym the first time you mention it in an article or technical paper, so it should still be a valid way to search.
Yeah, that's how I've been searching. However, there are other articles that don't have the full phrase.
Carson's right in that any serious article about the technology spells it out, but I'm actually looking for less technical articles like
this one. It's getting a lot of press in the non-technical media because it pertains to the packaging process rumoured to be used by TSMC for Apple's new iPhone 7.
In the end though, it may be a waste of time, because most of them seem to be claiming the iPhone 7's A10 SoC will be produced using a 10 nm process with InFO packaging, but the CPU guys at AT say that's most likely wrong. It's likely to be a 16 nm FF+ process, albeit possibly with InFO, and 10 nm won't come until the A11 in the iPhone 7s in 2017.
Reminds me of when I was searching for a company and all I knew was its acronym: AND. Doing an internet search for AND was futile. After days of searching I finally figured out that it was "AND Optoelectronics". That helped a bit. But even to this day, you can't easily find that company online (try it). They probably thought that they were clever when naming it. But then the internet came around and they are probably losing out on a lot of business when no one can find them.
The acronym HD DVD annoyed me to no end for this reason (when HD DVD was still a thing). If you searched for it, you'd get a bazillion hits on DVD mixed in with hits on HD DVD. If you searched HDDVD, you'd miss some stuff.
The stupid part of this was the name was created in the era of the internet and Google.