How Democrats are handing Donald Trump a 2nd Term as POTUS.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

skull

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2000
2,209
327
126
If it wasn’t EBT then how would a cashier at Walmart know they were getting public assistance?



First, you realize that the large majority of people on public assistance have jobs and that’s normal, right?

Yeah I know thats another big thing they do, they won't apply themselves and work more than 30 hours/week minimum wage because if they do they'll lose their benefits. Then the ones that work will claim the ones that don't work or only work for cash, kids on their income taxes to maximize that EIC.

Second, what precisely do you do in ‘the hood’ that gives you this sort of insight into such a wide range of people and the specific government benefits they receive? It sounds like you claim to know a minimum of four separate people who are currently or recently been engaging in fraud, at least one of them well enough to be inside their house, examining their shoe room. Are you a social worker or something?

Contractor for rental property companies. The chick with the shoe room was bragging about it to me while I was working on her furnace, drives a beamer suv too. Ask the landlord after isn't she on section 8? Yeah how the fuck does she have a shoe room and a beamer? Shes owns a beauty shop and only takes cash...

I know more than that, thats just the stories that stick out to me. The dope dealers getting assistance is multiple. Government assistance fraud is riff. Not only do I work in these peoples homes but I use to be a loser too and hang with people that did this shit.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Why do you keep repeating this lie after how many times your own post history has shown you to be a hardcore right wing Republican going back to your join date in 2005?


Total bullshit. I leaned left overall the last ~10 years, I was pro-GWB (over Al Gore), but started to sour on him in his second term. Then Obama got elected, wasn't' terrible and the right showed their ugliness, but I thought Obama didn't deserve as much hate as he got. Then Trump got elected and the left said, "Hold my beer..." And again, America is really flourishing under Trump, but the left try to say he's the worst or one of the worst. It's laughable and the left has gone full retard lately because of it.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,735
28,908
136
Oh please. Leftists these days probe judicial candidates for any hint that they might actually be serious Christians. Imagine what would happen if FDR was president right now and dropped a line like this:

"In teaching this democratic faith to American children, we need the sustaining, buttressing aid of those great ethical religious teachings which are the heritage of our modern civilization. For ‘not upon strength nor upon power, but upon the spirit of God’ shall our democracy be founded.”

Or perhaps...

“With every passing year I become more confident that humanity is moving forward to the practical application of the teachings of Christianity as they affect the individual lives of men and women everywhere.”

Somehow I think democrat heads would spin far more than republican ones.
As opposed to the party that only want religious freedom for Christians.

Pick your poison
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,643
50,877
136
Total bullshit. I leaned left overall the last ~10 years, I was pro-GWB (over Al Gore), but started to sour on him in his second term. Then Obama got elected, wasn't' terrible and the right showed their ugliness, but I thought Obama didn't deserve as much hate as he got. Then Trump got elected and the left said, "Hold my beer..." And again, America is really flourishing under Trump, but the left try to say he's the worst or one of the worst. It's laughable and the left has gone full retard lately because of it.

Why do you keep repeating the same lies over and over. You were already confronted with your own posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brycejones

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,938
9,221
136
Agenda Item 1 on year 1 should be to revise the apportionment formula to properly represent urban areas in the US House and admit all US territories (that pass a referendum) and DC as states.

Yeah—I thought of that as part of item 2 but sooner the better. Also, I forgot something else:

- At some point in Year 1—need to start debate on how a digital privacy bill of rights would work in the US. Not sure we need to clone GDPR, but we need something. Also need greater transparency over dark money expenditures for micro-targeting ads on mobile and social media. I may be wrong, but I believe at this point if a SuperPAC wanted to run an influence campaign similar to what Russia did in the 2016 election, and all their funding was domestic (and they weren’t using stolen or ill-gotten demographic data), it would all be legal.