Cliffs of the article: Man brought gun to work, put it in his coat which was on a chair and sat down on it. Gun fired and shot him in his legs.
Now my question, how did the news not make a mountain out of a mole? Should the news have read "MAN BRINGS GUN TO WORK, SHOOTS HIMSELF"? This doesn't make any sense.
And notice how they are downplaying the important part? Read this
" McGuire said his department has no record of the man being licensed to carry a concealed weapon."
IMHO the reporter and the writer should be fired for not capitalizing on a golden opportunity to sensationalize.
http://www.chron.com/disp/stor...ine/metro/5260502.html
Now my question, how did the news not make a mountain out of a mole? Should the news have read "MAN BRINGS GUN TO WORK, SHOOTS HIMSELF"? This doesn't make any sense.
And notice how they are downplaying the important part? Read this
" McGuire said his department has no record of the man being licensed to carry a concealed weapon."
IMHO the reporter and the writer should be fired for not capitalizing on a golden opportunity to sensationalize.
http://www.chron.com/disp/stor...ine/metro/5260502.html
