- Nov 12, 2004
- 1,664
- 0
- 0
I'm not a basketball fan in the slightest. Just curious why the Dallas Mavericks did not keep Steve Nash?
Originally posted by: slayer202
what everyone else said is right, except what tfinch said has nothing to do with it, and hes just trying to show his knowledge.
also, I believe he was having some back problems
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: slayer202
what everyone else said is right, except what tfinch said has nothing to do with it, and hes just trying to show his knowledge.
also, I believe he was having some back problems
How is what I said not right, or not have anything to do with the situation? Dallas did try to keep him. They offered him a deal. Nash did start his career in Phoenix. Phoenix did offer more money than Dallas to Nash, which qualifies as a nice deal.
WTF are you talking about?
Originally posted by: slayer202
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: slayer202
what everyone else said is right, except what tfinch said has nothing to do with it, and hes just trying to show his knowledge.
also, I believe he was having some back problems
How is what I said not right, or not have anything to do with the situation? Dallas did try to keep him. They offered him a deal. Nash did start his career in Phoenix. Phoenix did offer more money than Dallas to Nash, which qualifies as a nice deal.
WTF are you talking about?
nash starting his career in phoenix had nothing to do with him going back. nor did dallas indeed trying to keep him, nor did phoenix offering him a good offer. surely dallas was offering a good amount, but the suns just offered more. + the fact that dallas didnt think nash was worth the money + nash wasnt as good back then + he was injury prone were the main factors.
I didn't say you were wrong, I just meant it wasn't very relevant
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: slayer202
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: slayer202
what everyone else said is right, except what tfinch said has nothing to do with it, and hes just trying to show his knowledge.
also, I believe he was having some back problems
How is what I said not right, or not have anything to do with the situation? Dallas did try to keep him. They offered him a deal. Nash did start his career in Phoenix. Phoenix did offer more money than Dallas to Nash, which qualifies as a nice deal.
WTF are you talking about?
nash starting his career in phoenix had nothing to do with him going back. nor did dallas indeed trying to keep him, nor did phoenix offering him a good offer. surely dallas was offering a good amount, but the suns just offered more. + the fact that dallas didnt think nash was worth the money + nash wasnt as good back then + he was injury prone were the main factors.
I didn't say you were wrong, I just meant it wasn't very relevant
How do you know that it didn't have anything to do with it? Are you his agent or personal confidant?
6 years/63 million is not a good deal for a player that "wasn't as good back then"?
Originally posted by: DoubleROFL
Nobody predicted that he would become insanely good all of a sudden.
In Dallas, he was just a above average point guard.
Neither does Mark Cuban, that's why they haven't won a title.I don't know anything about basketball
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Neither does Mark Cuban, that's why they haven't won a title.I don't know anything about basketball
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Neither does Mark Cuban, that's why they haven't won a title.I don't know anything about basketball
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Neither does Mark Cuban, that's why they haven't won a title.I don't know anything about basketball
:roll:
They've had 8 seasons in a row with 50+ wins in the western conference. That's a very impressive feat. They *should* have won the series against Miami but it wasn't Cuban's fault that some of his players didn't show up to play the last half.
He's an owner, not a coach, and not a player on the court.
Putting together a team with that kind of record in their conference is nothing to sneeze at.
And I'm not a Mav's appologist in any shape or form.
Originally posted by: chuckywang
The Mavericks actually won more games their first year without Steve Nash than their last year with him.
I'd say the Mavs are doing fine and letting him go was not a death sentence for them.
