How come Crash gets 4 stars....

[Maleficus]

Crash = weak

 

[Syringer]

8.3 rating on IMDB, ranked #88 all time, 75% fresh rating on RT, best picture award. Anyone who doesn't like it would be in a slight minority to say the least..

 

[6000SUX]

Originally posted by: Syringer
8.3 rating on IMDB, ranked #88 all time, 75% fresh rating on RT, best picture award. Anyone who doesn't like it would be in a slight minority to say the least..

That's okay. It's pathetic for it to be ranked so highly on a website, but that just highlights how uncultured most people are. You should also remember that most people don't go to that website, and the people who do are likely not representative of everyone.

 

[Syringer]

Originally posted by: 6000SUX

Originally posted by: Syringer
8.3 rating on IMDB, ranked #88 all time, 75% fresh rating on RT, best picture award. Anyone who doesn't like it would be in a slight minority to say the least..

That's okay. It's pathetic for it to be ranked so highly on a website, but that just highlights how uncultured most people are. You should also remember that most people don't go to that website, and the people who do are likely not representative of everyone.

Do you have any idea what rotten tomatoes is? Or the type of people that vote on IMDB? IMDB usually consists of pseudo movie critics who devote their lives to movies. I'm sure most people wouldn't disagree very much with the top all time choices. The fact that you or anyone else dislike a certain movie does not mean that there aren't a great number of educated, cultured, well informed people that must share your opinion.

Movie elitists ftl.

 

[6000SUX]

Originally posted by: Syringer

Originally posted by: 6000SUX

Originally posted by: Syringer
8.3 rating on IMDB, ranked #88 all time, 75% fresh rating on RT, best picture award. Anyone who doesn't like it would be in a slight minority to say the least..

That's okay. It's pathetic for it to be ranked so highly on a website, but that just highlights how uncultured most people are. You should also remember that most people don't go to that website, and the people who do are likely not representative of everyone.

Do you have any idea what rotten tomatoes is? Or the type of people that vote on IMDB? IMDB usually consists of pseudo movie critics who devote their lives to movies. I'm sure most people wouldn't disagree very much with the top all time choices. The fact that you or anyone else dislike a certain movie does not mean that there aren't a great number of educated, cultured, well informed people that must share your opinion.

Movie elitists ftl.

Ah. So the fact that someone posts on a popular website means that they have good taste! No-logic FTL.

 

[6000SUX]

If you look at the IMDB rankings, they are seriously flawed. "Shawshank Redemption" the second-best movie of all time? My ass. Exactly zero real film critics would agree with those rankings.

 

[preslove]

Originally posted by: Amplifier
Anyone who liked Crash is a fvcking moron.

Yes I'm talking to you person who is reading this post and thought Crash was insightful or intelligent.

:thumbsup:

 

[The Batt?sai]

Originally posted by: BlueWeasel
A star is removed once the movie has been played a total of 10,000 times on TBS and TNT. Therefore, that's why SR only has 3 stars.

lol

 

[sygyzy]

I love the Crash bashing simply because it addresses race. I have never seen a quicker deathstrike for any person, movie, subject, etc than race. It's like cool now to be racist on ATOT.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: PaulNEPats

Originally posted by: Lonyo
Err, different reviewers have different opinions?

That's bullshit Lonyo. There's no way in hell Crash is better than Shawshank

Hey, way to get worked up other nothing!!!!:roll:

 

[Excelsior]

Originally posted by: Amplifier
Anyone who liked Crash is a fvcking moron.

Yes I'm talking to you person who is reading this post and thought Crash was insightful or intelligent.

So in order to like a movie one also has to find it "intelligent or insightful"?

😕

I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Excelsior

Originally posted by: Amplifier
Anyone who liked Crash is a fvcking moron.

Yes I'm talking to you person who is reading this post and thought Crash was insightful or intelligent.

So in order to like a movie one also has to find it "intelligent or insightful"?

😕

I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Keep in mind this is the same piece of fungus who thinks Ann Coulter is intelligent and insightful.

 

[Excelsior]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Excelsior

Originally posted by: Amplifier
Anyone who liked Crash is a fvcking moron.

Yes I'm talking to you person who is reading this post and thought Crash was insightful or intelligent.

So in order to like a movie one also has to find it "intelligent or insightful"?

😕

I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Keep in mind this is the same piece of fungus who thinks Ann Coulter is intelligent and insightful.

:laugh:

 

[CVSiN]

Originally posted by: EvilYoda
Because everybody thought that Crash was ground breaking, amazing, the best thing since sliced bread.

I still don't get it...I like Paul Haggis' work and all, but if I had to pick between MDB and Crash, there'd be no hesitation in picking the former.

Crash wasnt groundbreaking it was a racist pile of crap..

no redeeming value at all.

 

[DivideBYZero]

Originally posted by: CVSiN

Originally posted by: EvilYoda
Because everybody thought that Crash was ground breaking, amazing, the best thing since sliced bread.

I still don't get it...I like Paul Haggis' work and all, but if I had to pick between MDB and Crash, there'd be no hesitation in picking the former.

Crash wasnt groundbreaking it was a racist pile of crap..

no redeeming value at all.

OK, so you didn't understand it, did you? 😀