Originally posted by: aeroguy
Do you think it is worth the money saved to not be as comfortable?Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: aeroguy
Touche to vic and ronstang.
It looks like windows > A/C, but only slightly in a sedan (unfortunately they don't show the y-axis so we can't see how much). Page 15 of the above link proved it to me.
I hate being wrong, but will still use the A/C![]()
I didn't see this post. But then again I didn't need to since I have been testing and confirming the results for 26 years.![]()
Assuming you drive half your 12,000 miles when the ambient temperature is above your comfort level and half below:
6000 miles at 29 mpg = 207 gallons x $2 per gallon = $414
6000 miles at 27 mpg = 222 gallons x $2 per gallon = $444
So you save $30 per year with the windows open vs. A/C on. Even if you drive 12,000 miles per year in the heat you only save $60.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Why is this an "are you cheap issue"? I personally prefer to have the windows down and I live in Texas. I will use the AC when I have passengers that prefer it and times when I want to cool down but for the most part I have the windows down whether it s Summer or Winter. I guess this comes from being older and growing up with my first two cars not even having AC. You have to remember that most cars from the 50s and 60 had no air or it was an option and not always a common one. I still have 4 classic cars and only one has AC and even though it is still in the project phase once it is finished the only reason I put AC in the car was the dehumidified defroster...which is MANDATORY in the humid climate of Houston. In my Lexus I usually have the windows down and the sunroof open unless the woman is with me. Sometimes these things just come down to personal preference.
Originally posted by: jndietz
i drive with my windows down and i hate paying 2.09 for gas![]()
