I bought a Barton 2500 from NewEgg a while ago, which turned out to be DOA. I ended up having to RMA it through AMD, and I finally got my new processor in the mail today, but the CPU itself, and the heatsink look different (appearance wise) than the original Barton I had. The first one I got was tan, and the new one is green. The packaging says "With 333 MHz FSB", but otherwise there's no indication as to whether this is a Barton, or whether AMD is trying to pull a fast one on me.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Matt
PS: The longer version of the story is that after I RMA'd the DOA processor, AMD sent me back a Thoroughbred 2600, which is a slight upgrade in processor speed, but a downgrade in terms of the L2 cache. I took a chance and sent it back to them and said I would wait for the Barton 2500 to become available because they were apparently out of the Barton (or maybe just trying to unload to excess Thiroughbreds). The main thing that bothered me was the fact that they didn't ask me first before sending it, and since I ordered the Barton 2500 after a month of research, that's the processor I expected to use in my system. Anyway, my question is: would the extra 100MHz processor speed have a greater impact on the performance of my system than the 512K L2 cache?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Matt
PS: The longer version of the story is that after I RMA'd the DOA processor, AMD sent me back a Thoroughbred 2600, which is a slight upgrade in processor speed, but a downgrade in terms of the L2 cache. I took a chance and sent it back to them and said I would wait for the Barton 2500 to become available because they were apparently out of the Barton (or maybe just trying to unload to excess Thiroughbreds). The main thing that bothered me was the fact that they didn't ask me first before sending it, and since I ordered the Barton 2500 after a month of research, that's the processor I expected to use in my system. Anyway, my question is: would the extra 100MHz processor speed have a greater impact on the performance of my system than the 512K L2 cache?