how can i make sure to get a 0.13nm A64 3500+ ?

[flexy]

in addition to

AMD pricecuts and new 0.09nm CPUs

 

[ViRGE]

Just out of curiosity, why do you need such a particular CPU? They're both at the same clock speeds and performance, so I can't see why you'd need something so specific. But anyhow, most retailers list the CPU process along with the CPU, or at least the core name(90nm is Winchester). You shouldn't have a problem finding a store that carries the 130nm part.

 

[JBT]

uhh why wouldn't you want a .09? They run cooler... Either way most stores will still have the .13u's for awhile. It should be listed under the specifications too.

 

[klah]

130nm will have the product code: ADA3500DEP4AW
90nm will have the product code: ADA3500DIK4BI

 

[flexy]

Originally posted by: klah
130nm will have the product code: ADA3500DEP4AW
90nm will have the product code: ADA3500DIK4BI

THX !

bte. i plan to overclock and according to 'people' the 0.09 do NOT run cooler, rather the opposite 🙂

 

[Lonyo]

Originally posted by: flexy

Originally posted by: klah
130nm will have the product code: ADA3500DEP4AW
90nm will have the product code: ADA3500DIK4BI

THX !

bte. i plan to overclock and according to 'people' the 0.09 do NOT run cooler, rather the opposite 🙂

Makes sense, smaller die size = less SA for heat dissipation = not necessarily cooler.
Look at Prescott (new design too though, so not apples to apples)

 

[Matthias99]

Originally posted by: flexy

Originally posted by: klah
130nm will have the product code: ADA3500DEP4AW
90nm will have the product code: ADA3500DIK4BI

THX !

bte. i plan to overclock and according to 'people' the 0.09 do NOT run cooler, rather the opposite 🙂

Although hardly overwhelming evidence, Techreport's early article suggests otherwise.

Edit: Er, I mean, they suggest it runs cooler than an equivalent 130nm. Part of it is that the 90nm chips run stock at 1.4V instead of 1.5V.