PeeluckyDuckee
Diamond Member
Just something that came to mind.....
If a city that lies on the fault line and near the seashore and rocky mountains (many west coast cities in the US may qualify) suddenly had a devastating 8.0 earthquake, how would this affect the property value of direct neighbouring cities? Is it safe to assume some of those affected would move to the neighbouring cities due to proximity and similiar geography? Thus causing an influx in demand and property value would trend upwards short term?
Or would the influx be too small to feel any impact of movement?
If a city that lies on the fault line and near the seashore and rocky mountains (many west coast cities in the US may qualify) suddenly had a devastating 8.0 earthquake, how would this affect the property value of direct neighbouring cities? Is it safe to assume some of those affected would move to the neighbouring cities due to proximity and similiar geography? Thus causing an influx in demand and property value would trend upwards short term?
Or would the influx be too small to feel any impact of movement?