• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How accurate is Coolbits "Detect Optimal Frequencies"

S

SNM

Member
Title says it all. I've got a Leadtek 6600GT, and the auto-detect only puts it at 538/540(once) core and 1080 mem. In Anand's review, he got ranges of 535-590 (dominant on the high end) and 1120-1220. Not that I'm not satisfied with stock speeds, or am surprised that he might have gotten binned cards, or that I just got a card on the downside of the curve, but I was curious if it's worth testing hard.
 
not very

i find its pretty much based off temperatures

i set it to find optimal freq on a cold day, window open lots of 2 degrees air going in. temps were way down, and it gave me somehting like 422 and 1.14ghz

normal day normal room temp and it only shows about 410 and 1.11Ghz
 
Originally posted by: SNM
Title says it all. I've got a Leadtek 6600GT, and the auto-detect only puts it at 538/540(once) core and 1080 mem. In Anand's review, he got ranges of 535-590 (dominant on the high end) and 1120-1220. Not that I'm not satisfied with stock speeds, or am surprised that he might have gotten binned cards, or that I just got a card on the downside of the curve, but I was curious if it's worth testing hard.
Click to expand...
When I do auto-detect, it only gives me stock speeds. When I go manual, I can get 585/1210 totally stable with a Zalman VF700-Cu on full; it's totally stable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top