We had a life math class in high school 20 years ago. We discussed how to balance checkbooks, investments, bills ect ect. Real eye opener on compounding interest.
Any particular lesson you learned from that class that you have applied in your lifetime?
Invest early and often.
Studies have been done and those classes have no effect, sadly.
So you actually learned how to invest in school? That's pretty useful in my opinion.
these lenders prey upon people when the chips are down. Its not that people cannot u nderstand this but when you need cash to feed a family, pay a mortgage and run a car to get to a job sometimes....a Faustian deal is made and these lenders are there to provide this service at a predatory rate and terms. These "lenders" are scamming not only returning troops but the public at large. And the industry lobby for these scammers hace succeeded in reming this protection. And the government stands ultimately for whom in the end?? The person with the most money?
Because when you see someone (or an industry) purposely preying on and by their very business model and training trying to victimize people, its just a decent thing to do? You couldn't pick a sleazier industry to be championing.
I agree and I still can't believe that high schools still don't teach a "life" class. Seniors in high school should be required to take a class that will prepare them for the real world once they leave high school. It should teach things like, how to apply to college, how to apply for student loans, understanding loan terms, understanding credit cards, how to apply for rent, how to apply for a job, how to vote, how to save money, how to budget, how to shop, etc, etc.
Partially, I think it's because people have wants that over ride logic. I have customers that have way nicer electronics than I do.I've always thought the same thing, but I've seen several studies that show that people who have participated in such classes (whether in middle/high school, college or after) don't do statistically better in terms of understanding basic finances and financial logic (or even financial literacy). It seems counter intuitive to me though
So you actually learned how to invest in school? That's pretty useful in my opinion.
Eskimospy, have you found the links to that study you were talking about?
So you actually learned how to invest in school? That's pretty useful in my opinion.
Eskimospy, have you found the links to that study you were talking about?
Not how to invest. But the advantages of investing early in life.
You don't need a class to learn how to invest. The answer of how to invest for normal people is one sentence:
Stick your money in a low fee index fund and leave it there.
That's everything you need to know.
There are a number of them, and I don't remember the exact ones I was thinking of. Here's a more recent paper that discusses the limited impact of financial literacy classes:
http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication Files/13-064_c7b52fa0-1242-4420-b9b6-73d32c639826.pdf
Interestingly enough they find that just more general math seems to help, although I have no idea if other studies have replicated this result or not.
How many 15-16 years olds know that? And it wasnt how to invest as much as showing the power of compounding interest of doing it earlier in life than later.
The class dealt with more than just investing. That was just a single example of something I used in life from the class that was very useful.
The people who would learn and benefit from that kind of information are probably the people who figure it out along the way anyway. The people who lack basic financial literacy or the ability to understand financial concepts are apparently no better off down the line after taking such courses.
If that's true, then WHY would anyone go out of their way to insert additional language into a bill in order to further protect soldiers? Are those protections going to cost the government a lot of money? No? Then why?This isn't a big deal for the most part, in the Military (Army at least) we place emphasis on new soldiers and these types of things.
Most E4 and below are told to go see ACS (Army Community Services) prior to getting any sort of loan or when buying a car. They have people who actively monitor those things and provide serious no bs guidance on what you can and cannot afford and what is a good loan.
They also have programs and services to provide interest free loans in extreme circumstances.
If that's true, then WHY would anyone go out of their way to insert additional language into a bill in order to further protect soldiers? Are those protections going to cost the government a lot of money? No? Then why?
There are a number of them, and I don't remember the exact ones I was thinking of. Here's a more recent paper that discusses the limited impact of financial literacy classes:
http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication Files/13-064_c7b52fa0-1242-4420-b9b6-73d32c639826.pdf
Interestingly enough they find that just more general math seems to help, although I have no idea if other studies have replicated this result or not.