I have a certain view on hard drives and how to know what drives are good (other than personal experience). That is to ask a tech who deals with replacing hard drives alot. In my personal pc "career", I have a 2 gig ide16 seagate drive still going strong, a 2.6 gig maxtor that died but the rma'd drive (4 or so years old) still going, an 8.4 gig udma33 maxtor still going, had a 3.1 gig WD die on me, and now have a 40 gig maxtor 7200 going fine and a Samsung 80 gig 7200rpm going fine as well. I've only had 1 seagate and 1 WD and the WD died, but that's hardly conclusive. Anyhow... my friend is 32 and has been a tech for 10 years now. According to him... some of the hard drive manufacturers that used to be rock solid have let their quality control go downhill. He used to LOVE Western Digital, but anymore that's about all he's replacing. Also, he has replaced according to him 9 out of 10 seagate baracuda IV's that have been installed by him. He has 2 baracuda III's at home he uses that are going great... so he says he must have gotten lucky. Anyhow... according to him the maxtors are reliable and the samsungs are very reliable (that's why i didn't go with the IBM 80 gig for the same price of around $90). Anyhow... things change. I'm happy with Maxtor and Samsung still has yet to be proven to me at least. If my current Maxtor dies... i'll be pissed (especially the samsung since i have all my important things on there)... but such is life. Does that make the line of hard drives un-reliable? No... but if i get 3 more rma'd then ya.. i'd say so. Sorry for ranting.