I have a couple of questions.
Currently my dad's offices, only 6 computers networked, is getting internet access from a fair cable company; we are getting 0.7 megabits down and 0.8 megabits up (although our contract says 1.5 megabits). Soon our internet provider will be switching to the @home network, which I've had no experience with although it is said to be much faster. We are also paying a webhosting provider $50/month for webhosting of his little traffic but large-database website - He probably gets less than 5 order transactions per day. I proposed to him that it may be cheaper in the long run to have our own on-site server to be used as a network router, web server, FTP server, mail server, and file server. I also told him that he would be able to do all of his work on his website, which he does a lot of, and access is e-mail quicker because it would now be over a 100 megabit connection instead of a 0.7 megabit connection to the off-site server somewhere in CA.
1. Do these server components look to be good for the tasks - remember he doesn't get much traffic:
300-watt supply
Abit KT7 (i have an extra one and I can put it in the server for free next to buying a different one)
900 Mhz Thunderbird (same case)
256MB SDRAM
NVIDIA RIVA TNT (of course I don't need anything powerful for video)
Dual Netgear FX311 NIC's
12x/8x CD-RW
Floppy
Windows 2000 Server
I will also be upgrading 5 of the 6 computers to Windows 2000 and 128MB of RAM
2. What should I use to backup?
3. I won't be able to have 2 DNS servers to direct the domain name, what can I do as far as DNS?
4. The @home connection - Is it fast enough to support a server? I've heard that @home shut down port 80 on its network because of that new virus.. obviously I can't have this happen.
Any input would be most appreciated!
Thanks,
Ben Hughes
Currently my dad's offices, only 6 computers networked, is getting internet access from a fair cable company; we are getting 0.7 megabits down and 0.8 megabits up (although our contract says 1.5 megabits). Soon our internet provider will be switching to the @home network, which I've had no experience with although it is said to be much faster. We are also paying a webhosting provider $50/month for webhosting of his little traffic but large-database website - He probably gets less than 5 order transactions per day. I proposed to him that it may be cheaper in the long run to have our own on-site server to be used as a network router, web server, FTP server, mail server, and file server. I also told him that he would be able to do all of his work on his website, which he does a lot of, and access is e-mail quicker because it would now be over a 100 megabit connection instead of a 0.7 megabit connection to the off-site server somewhere in CA.
1. Do these server components look to be good for the tasks - remember he doesn't get much traffic:
300-watt supply
Abit KT7 (i have an extra one and I can put it in the server for free next to buying a different one)
900 Mhz Thunderbird (same case)
256MB SDRAM
NVIDIA RIVA TNT (of course I don't need anything powerful for video)
Dual Netgear FX311 NIC's
12x/8x CD-RW
Floppy
Windows 2000 Server
I will also be upgrading 5 of the 6 computers to Windows 2000 and 128MB of RAM
2. What should I use to backup?
3. I won't be able to have 2 DNS servers to direct the domain name, what can I do as far as DNS?
4. The @home connection - Is it fast enough to support a server? I've heard that @home shut down port 80 on its network because of that new virus.. obviously I can't have this happen.
Any input would be most appreciated!
Thanks,
Ben Hughes