VirtualLarry
No Lifer
Well, I've strayed, and now I'm coming home.
I built some budget gaming rigs back in 2006, with E2140 CPUs, and Gigabyte P35-DS3R mobos. I upgraded them some time later with Q9300 CPUs from Microcenter that I got for $100 + tax on clearance.
Started out with Radeon 1950Pro cards, then upgraded to HD4850 512MB cards.
Anyways, clocked to 3.0, the Q9300 is a fairly beefy (well, mid-range these days) rig.
But I was really concerned at some point about power consumption, so I bought an E-350 rig. Then another one, because the price was right. Tried using those rigs for some time, but they were just a touch too slow, even with an SSD.
So I invested in a pre-built store-bought computer, a Gateway slimline with a Sandy Bridge G630 Pentium CPU in it. I upgraded the RAM from 4GB to 8GB, added an SSD, and an NV GT430 video card. It was faster than the E-350 rigs, by far, and best yet, it had almost comparable power usage. 42W idle, 65W CPU load, ~94W CPU+GPU load doing distributed computing.
But the other night, I was listening to my internet radio, and it kept skipping, when I was scrolling my web browser. Even scrolling Windows explorer, would cause it to skip. I suspected a video driver problem with the GT430.
So, once again, I'm back to my Q9300 @ 3.0, with my trusty HD4850 card, and 8GB of DDR2-800.
Internet radio doesn't skip (well, very rarely, and not as pronounced as before), even when I'm doing DC on all four CPU cores, and the video card. Even scrolling web pages isn't bad, while I'm using the video card for DC. (I've experienced massive GUI slowdown using lower-end NV cards like the GT430 to do DC. Not that noticeable on my GTX460 though.)
Edit: For a point of discussion, could having 400FSB be better in some way than 100BCLK?
I built some budget gaming rigs back in 2006, with E2140 CPUs, and Gigabyte P35-DS3R mobos. I upgraded them some time later with Q9300 CPUs from Microcenter that I got for $100 + tax on clearance.
Started out with Radeon 1950Pro cards, then upgraded to HD4850 512MB cards.
Anyways, clocked to 3.0, the Q9300 is a fairly beefy (well, mid-range these days) rig.
But I was really concerned at some point about power consumption, so I bought an E-350 rig. Then another one, because the price was right. Tried using those rigs for some time, but they were just a touch too slow, even with an SSD.
So I invested in a pre-built store-bought computer, a Gateway slimline with a Sandy Bridge G630 Pentium CPU in it. I upgraded the RAM from 4GB to 8GB, added an SSD, and an NV GT430 video card. It was faster than the E-350 rigs, by far, and best yet, it had almost comparable power usage. 42W idle, 65W CPU load, ~94W CPU+GPU load doing distributed computing.
But the other night, I was listening to my internet radio, and it kept skipping, when I was scrolling my web browser. Even scrolling Windows explorer, would cause it to skip. I suspected a video driver problem with the GT430.
So, once again, I'm back to my Q9300 @ 3.0, with my trusty HD4850 card, and 8GB of DDR2-800.
Internet radio doesn't skip (well, very rarely, and not as pronounced as before), even when I'm doing DC on all four CPU cores, and the video card. Even scrolling web pages isn't bad, while I'm using the video card for DC. (I've experienced massive GUI slowdown using lower-end NV cards like the GT430 to do DC. Not that noticeable on my GTX460 though.)
Edit: For a point of discussion, could having 400FSB be better in some way than 100BCLK?
Last edited: