• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Home Inkjet Printer Shoot-out

I

imported_Nav

Junior Member
Which of these would you guys recommend over the other two?

There's not much in the price difference between the three, about ten bucks... so which would you choose and why?

Would love to hear from folks who own these/similar printers and their experiences.

Thank you
 
I don't know alot about Canon's new line of printers, but I have a i960 and love it. I did alot of research on photo printers at the time (about a year ago) and this one came out on top. I was looking for a printer dedicated to photos as I have a laser for everything else, so when the reviews I read said it was not so good with text, that did not phase me.

I have read some reviews on the IP4000 and am very impressed. They did away with the extra photo inks (my i960 has 6 ink tanks) but apparently due to the smaller droplet size (1 picoliter vs 2 with my 960) and the higher res, the 4000 does not need the extra inks. I would really like to compare them side by side, but until my 960 dies, I don't really plan on a replacement.

just google for reviews comparing those three printers, personally after reading about issues with both HP and Epson having pictures that don't last (plus the fact that HP uses those dumb three-in-one ink tanks that cost much more per ml) I stayed away from them

-spike
 
I love my IP3000. I'd love it even more if it were an IP4000. 🙂 The dual paper trays are very slick. I keep 4x6 sheets in the bottom cassette for photos and I put normal inkjet paper in the top loader. I can switch between the top loader and cassette either with software or by hitting a button on the front of the printer. It also doesn't hurt that ink is cheap and lasts a long time. I've also found Canon's support to be good as well.
 
I am very happy with my Epson R-200. It's, basically, the R-300 without the card slots. Since I will never print directly from the memory card but from the PC, I couldn't see spending more money for a feature I will never use.

One feature that the Epson has that I absolutly love is CD Printing. Printing directly onto a "printable" CD/DVD is extremely nice, especially if you like to burn a lot of CD's.

If you consider an Epson, let me save you some trouble. On Paper Selection, go with Epson paper. Especially if you want glossy stock. The results are dramatically better on Epson stock. I have also had good result on Ritz Camera's Satin Finish and Canvas stock. Actually, the Satin Finish stock is exceptional. That actually surprised me since the premium glossy "archival" Ritz paper was terrible on my Epson.

 
Originally posted by: Spike
I don't know alot about Canon's new line of printers, but I have a i960 and love it. I did alot of research on photo printers at the time (about a year ago) and this one came out on top. I was looking for a printer dedicated to photos as I have a laser for everything else, so when the reviews I read said it was not so good with text, that did not phase me.

I have read some reviews on the IP4000 and am very impressed. They did away with the extra photo inks (my i960 has 6 ink tanks) but apparently due to the smaller droplet size (1 picoliter vs 2 with my 960) and the higher res, the 4000 does not need the extra inks. I would really like to compare them side by side, but until my 960 dies, I don't really plan on a replacement.

just google for reviews comparing those three printers, personally after reading about issues with both HP and Epson having pictures that don't last (plus the fact that HP uses those dumb three-in-one ink tanks that cost much more per ml) I stayed away from them

-spike
Click to expand...

Minor correction. The IP5000 (which retails for about $199) is the printer that has 1 picoliter printing (which does eliminate the need for PhotoMagenta and PhotoCyan). The PhotoCyan was also the reason why printheads were getting clogged so often so that's another plus. The IP4000 replaces the old i860 which never had the extra PM & PC cartridges to begin with. The IP4000 still utilizes the 2 picoliter droplet size.
 
Hold on there junior. Did you know the i4000 come in a wireless network version? I'd love to get one of those. My brother bought a HP last year, then he compared his photo prints with mine (canon s600) and he ran out and bought the canon i900D.
 
gibroni have you been reading my thread about getting a wireless DSL router (on a totally different website)? 😛

I am aware of the wireless version, the ip4000R I think.. but last I looked it cost 50% more than the ip4000.. not sure I want to spend that kind of money on a printer, plus I'm upgrading my whole system this month too!

But thanks for the observation!

PS. Is the i900D old, if so whats the current equivalent?
 
R300 all the way! I have the R200, and I am extremely happy!!! In most reviews it comes out first, and the ability to print on CDs and DVDs is unique.

People do not think they need to print on CDs and DVDs but once you get this printer you will be hooked.

Epson rules!

PS: People are reporting that sometimes the CD tray doesn't get loaded properly. Just take a napkin and clean the rubber feeders.
 
The R300 is good, and extremely good for photos but in my opinion loses out to the Canon and HP equivalents on text and graphics (see linked review above).

The ip4000 also prints on CDs and DVDs! (At least here in Europe it does 😛)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top