Sahakiel -
<< Highwire. This goes right back at ya (from the link you provided)
"Electric current is the rate of charge flow past a given point in an electric circuit, measured in coulombs/second which is named amperes"
Amperes is dependent on charge, not electrons. Electrons happen to have a fixed charge, so most people think that amperes measures electrons per second. >>
Can an electrical charge exist and not involve the presence or absence of an electron? I don't think so, at lease not outside of a nucleus and its strange zoo of subatomics.
Maybe I am missing something, but I don't know how to get a charge on something without it involving electrons. Do you? It is fundamental. If I want to charge something negatively, I just put electrons on it. If I want to charge something positively, I must take electrons away. The remaining protons give it a positive charge. If I rub a glass rod with fur, I am playing with electrons, removing them here, adding them there.
Any charge is some whole number multiple of the charge of one electron and the charge is there only because of the presence or absence of ELECTRONS there. Electric charge only comes in electron sized units, nothing smaller, nothing bigger. This applies also to all ions, protons and, err, it's a small list. The only basic things that have electric charge are electrons and protons outside of the zoo, that is. Ions are atoms with added or absent electrons. Electrical current involves the movement of mobil charges. So, you can count these electron sized units of charge carried past a given point, both positive and negative charges in positive and negative directions, take the algebraic sum and that is an electrical current.
By the way, a coulomb is the charge of a definite large number of electrons, the number I gave before - 1 amp second of current. So, amperes DOES measure electrons per second one way or the other. For example, a chromium ion in a plating bath can not travel up the wire to the ammeter. It meets an electron flowing in the opposite direction and forms a neutral chromium atom. So, you can bet you booty you are measuring electron flow.
<< Taking that into account, assume we have a plastic comb that carries an electric charge. You pass it through a fixed point in space at a certain speed, you get a certain measurement of current in amperes. You pass it through that same point at twice the speed, and you get twice the amperes. >>
Again, current is the amount of charge per unit time moving past a point. It has NOTHING to do with the velocity of the charge carrier. You may be confounding the words RATE ( few / many per unit time )and VELOCITY ( slow / fast )( distance per unit time ).
In the example you contrived, if you put a fixed density of charges on a comb and move it past a point, the rate and velocity will be CORRELATED, but again, only the rate is important. If you place the same total charge on a tiny comb as on a very large comb and move each comb past a point in one second, guess what? The slower moving charges on the tiny comb produce the same current as the faster charges on the larger, faster moving comb. Measuring current is really just a counting process, like counting the number of cars that past a toll booth in an hour. No radar gun needed.