poofyhairguy
Lifer
- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
RIM's multipart response:
Step 1. We stick our fingers in our ears.
Step 2. We all then sing "LA LA LA LA, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU."
FIFThem
RIM's multipart response:
Step 1. We stick our fingers in our ears.
Step 2. We all then sing "LA LA LA LA, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU."
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste
Its pretty crappy the way the west deals with its waste. You can look up the gory details yourself.
![]()
DO WANT
Oh and Apple were aloud to have been a bit half arsed with the first iPhone. There wasn't really anything to compete with it. Every other smartphone OS was obsessed with functionality rather than user experience and the general public didnt have any idea what a smartphone could or should do. Thats one of the reasons MS got lambasted for not having CP when Apple got away with it. People now expect all the functionality as well as a great user experience.
Look at WM7. Its current version is much further along than iOS or Android was at that point in their development, yet many are not considering getting a WM7 phone until the mature Mango version because quite simply we are all spoiled by mature iOS and Android and we are not willing to leave off key features like in the first iPhone days.
Wow, that is a great point I never thought of.
iOS (and to a lessor extent Android) were allowed to grow and mature IN THE MARKET because nothing else came close to either of them years ago.
Now any competitor in that space doesn't get that advantage- if has to be fully mature the day it launches.
Look at WM7. Its current version is much further along than iOS or Android was at that point in their development, yet many are not considering getting a WM7 phone until the mature Mango version because quite simply we are all spoiled by mature iOS and Android and we are not willing to leave off key features like in the first iPhone days.
RIM has to launch not just a new mobile OS, but one that needs to be mature and ready to go in the first or second gen of products with will feature parity with the mature systems. Heck, HP had the same challenge and had an ever bigger head start than RIM, and they failed.
Really poor response by RIM to that letter. Very disappointing.
"The company is thankfully in a solid business and financial position to tackle the opportunities ahead with a solid balance sheet (nearly $3 billion in cash and no debt)"
WOW if true. 3bn cash w/ no debt is no laughing matter.
My first "smartphone" was a WM phone. God it sucked SO BAD I cancelled the internet after a few months.
When I got my first iPhone (3gs) it completely changed the way I view phones. Prior to the iPhone, the phone was simply a tool I occasionally used and constant internet was "nice" to have.
Now I'm married to my phone and I couldn't imagine NOT having a smartphone. I'm open to the idea of Android if the right phone comes along, but as time passes it becomes a harder and harder proposition since I become more and more invested in the iOS ecosystem.
I loved WMphone. I could get it to do anything, and usually for free. Sure the stock UI was clunky as hell and you really had to know what you were doing to get the best out of it, but once you learned how it all worked it was awesome.
web browsing sucked on it and it sucked as a porn consumption device. POS xv6700
*snip*
:shudders:
goddamn those stylus days...might as well refer to them as the dark ages.
Verizon marketing FTW.iNorm said:Not really. Had RIM adopted the DROID OS they would be all profits right now.
RIM's response:
Not all ideas are shared with all employees. This is true of all companies. To assume that RIM would disseminate ALL product and timeline information to all employees, especially during a transitional period is pretty amazing. So many people in this thread fail to understand much about business. All they see is a weakness, and they're tearing at the wound trying to make it bleed more for thier enjoyment.
There is little value in this letter or this thread. The letter reveals nothing that anybody hasn't been saying for months; New UE, new UI, updated OS, engage Devs, etc. As I said before, it's mroe likely this is completely made up by BGR to support their recent comercialization and sale. The new owners of BGR want some return. What better than to come up with a 'scoop'?
To put it into perspective, Apple don't tell anyone in the company what they are doing if they are not on the critical path. Why should RIM be telling all to Employees right at the bottom of the pile all secrets, especially when you may have people like this 'guy' who will just blab it to a raft of blogs?
Anyway, what would I know, I only know employees in both Apple and RIM, whereas nearly all posters in here are just clique-y nerds deriding anything that is not a device of their choosing.
Again, I love how you will believe a blogger so quickly. It's pretty laughable.
