Originally posted by: Malak
Originally posted by: crazySOB297
I'm sorry, but anyone that believes that site for anything other than a joke should be shot.
So the research papers from IBM
IBM writes a lot of research papers on a lot of topics. Research papers != functioning real-world product.
the many white papers you can find on it
The theory behind holographic storage is well-developed. Commercializing it has proven extremely difficult. Again, white papers != functioning real-world product.
They can patent whatever crazy things they like. A lot of this stuff has been proven in the lab (to the point where you could patent it), but is a long ways from being commercially viable in any way. Patents != functioning real-world product.
If they have working models of anything like what they're talking about on that website, they sure aren't letting anybody else see them. They have a working laptop with 2TB of dirt-cheap high-speed holographic R/W storage (when everyone else is struggling to even make read-only holography work in any sort of economically feasable way) that they're ready to sell for $5-6k, and they don't seem to have shown it to anyone? No buzz, no previews, no benchmarks, nothing but a couple vague photos and a cheesy website?
Please tell me you understand how preposterous that sounds. This is pretty much the definition of 'too good to be true'.
the many other companies developing both devices and medium
A lot of people have been working on this sort of technology for a long time. Doesn't mean it's ready for prime time yet. Many people working on it != functioning real-world product.
and the articles in magazines
OMG! Magazine articles! Now you've convinced me! It must be real!
Magazine articles != functioning real-world product.
Perhaps I can interest you in
some really impressive-looking, flashy computers? Look, they have articles and technobabble! And press releases! And lots of RandomTechnologyThatIsCapitalizedForNoReason! And their website is very impressive...
For kicks, I looked up some of their patents (the ones listed on the website). There is some semi-reasonable stuff about magnetic-core RAM, and then a VERY BS-sounding patent (
link) dealing with the so-called "Gendlin Effect" (named after its discoverer, hoo-hey hoo-hey). Oddly, this 'effect' seems to exist only in their patents and press releases, as I cannot find any outside references to it. :roll: Also, this patent, unlike the other ones they list, is not referenced by any other patents (except some of their own, which to me do not appear directly related).
Found
this talking about some of the stuff. The technology appears to have just appeared out of nowhere. Technology like this does not appear out of nowhere.
An article about this "Gendlin" character:
link. Sounds like a real upstanding guy.
The two principals of Kappa Numerics to whom EN spoke were incensed by discussions of Dr. Gendlin commercializing the work, saying "everything he says is incorrect" and that they would prosecute.
In fact, Dr. Gendlin told EN, that not only was he the researcher behind Intel's new "StrataFlash" two-bit per cell memories because he worked on that at Kappa, but that in 1993 he showed Intel worldwide manufacturing VP Mike Splinter his work on Quantum and "Intel wanted it." Over what Kappa Numerics intended to do with the memory science, Dr. Gendlin and Kappa "divorced," he said, and a breach of contract suit began, which culminated in the injunction.
Through a spokesman, Intel Israel head of operations Dov Froman said he had not heard of Kappa Numerics and Mr. Splinter said Intel has "no relationship" with the company. Beyond that, the spokesman said, Intel did not "see the value in getting involved" with Dr. Gendlin's testimony.
I'm going to CES this year, so I'll be sure to find their booth and grill them mercilessly. Hopefully in front of investors.
