ThePresence
Elite Member
- Nov 19, 2001
- 27,727
- 16
- 81
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "
So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?
So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.
I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:
STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.
Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.
Now, how about them apples?
Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.
And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.
Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?
If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.
Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
While the murder of the Jews and other "undesierables" was more systematic, the murder of many Eastern Europeans was no less tragic, and no less meaningless. Whole villages were whipped out because the people were considered worthless races.
The only difference was the difference in the way the murder was carried out. These were not collateral damage deaths. They were intentional murder.
I understand that. But it was not a focused plan to wipe out a single group. It was more of a "we're here, let's kill them" kinda thing. In no way do I mean to detract from the tragedy of their deaths.
