Holocaust-Era Diary Surfaces in Netherlands

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.

Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

While the murder of the Jews and other "undesierables" was more systematic, the murder of many Eastern Europeans was no less tragic, and no less meaningless. Whole villages were whipped out because the people were considered worthless races.

The only difference was the difference in the way the murder was carried out. These were not collateral damage deaths. They were intentional murder.

I understand that. But it was not a focused plan to wipe out a single group. It was more of a "we're here, let's kill them" kinda thing. In no way do I mean to detract from the tragedy of their deaths.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

That was pointed out because the girl was Jewish.

As for the rest of your post, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. There is a very active and growing movement in the world that actively denies the holocaust ever happened.
Weren't you the same guy who said not to wallow in our past but to enjoy the present ? Yes... it was the Thanksgiving thread.

EXACTLY...

Shouldn't we be getting over the holocaust Amused? Moving on with our lives? not dredging it up every time some document of the event turns up?

:Q
The stupidity of your response has left me speechless.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or ethnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.


Actually you are wrong. You know nothing of Hitler's policies. Don't write any more BS, please. Read, learn. Do not show idiocy and ignorance in public - hide it and cure it.

Really? I've read most of Hitler's speeches and I have biographies on pretty much every Nazi leader. I've extensively studied their policy, I really doubt you did although you claim to.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.

Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

While the murder of the Jews and other "undesierables" was more systematic, the murder of many Eastern Europeans was no less tragic, and no less meaningless. Whole villages were whipped out because the people were considered worthless races.

The only difference was the difference in the way the murder was carried out. These were not collateral damage deaths. They were intentional murder.

I understand that. But it was not a focused plan to wipe out a single group. It was more of a "we're here, let's kill them" kinda thing. In no way do I mean to detract from the tragedy of their deaths.

OK, but I just wanted to point out that just because it wasn;t systematic, doesn't mean it wasn;t intentional murder. The East was invaded for living space for Germans. They did not expect to have to share it with the native populations... and we know what options that left them with.
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

That was pointed out because the girl was Jewish.

As for the rest of your post, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. There is a very active and growing movement in the world that actively denies the holocaust ever happened.
Weren't you the same guy who said not to wallow in our past but to enjoy the present ? Yes... it was the Thanksgiving thread.

EXACTLY...

Shouldn't we be getting over the holocaust Amused? Moving on with our lives? not dredging it up every time some document of the event turns up?

I already answered this. I'll paste it here for you:

Yes, it was. And the Jews are not wallowing in it. They are simply keeping the history from being hijacked by anti-semites with an agenda. The Jews have not let the history of the holocaust keep them down, In fact, they have thrived in spite of it.

I would also like to point out that there are still Jews living that suffered directly from the Holocaust. No Indian can claim that, nor can a black make that claim over slavery.

As long as there are jews alive that suffered directly from the Holocaust, I think it's fine for them to allow that to define their lives. THEY LIVED IT. They are not wallowing in history, they are telling their OWN story.


I don't understand how you see these two cultures as different. Can't it be argued that Native Americans telling are trying to preserve their story as much as the Jews? Can I assume that when all living survivors expire, THEN will be the time when the culture and the world should MOVE ON and not WALLOW?...
 
Jan 8, 2003
593
0
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.

Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

You sir, are a liar.

Or you know nothing of WWII and should shut up right about now (not an order, just a suggestion, of course).

Millions of non-Jews were killed specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.

Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

You sir, are a liar.

Or you know nothing of WWII and should shut up right about now (not an order, just a suggestion, of course).

Millions of non-Jews were killed specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.
Are incapable of understanding English? Please tell me now which groups of non-Jews were sent to death camps as part of a focused plan of ethnic cleansing in any kinds of numbers that approach the Jewish victims? I know that millions of people were killed because of their ethnicity, and I already discussed it. :roll:
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

I know you wanted a reaction to your trolling so I will give you one:


STFU asswipe. Maybe we'll be lucky and somebody will gas you or put you in an oven.

Well, you see, the point here is that Hitler's armies killed every fourth person of my people. Every fourth. Also, my blood relatives were killed. Also, some of them went through concentration camps. Not all survived. These are my blood relatives. The people I actually know.

Now, how about them apples?

Now, I will repeat: Hitler (well, indirectly) killed every fourth of my people. My people, thus (if we are talking numbers) suffered the most causalities (proportionately to the whole population). BTW, after war, there was one, single building left standing in the capital of my country- just one.

And you don't hear Jewish activists ever mentioning this. Why? Because they are only interested in Jewish agenda. In getting people to give Jews money and support. Other people do not matter, the only people that matter are Jews - or so the Jewish activists seem to think, based on their actions.

Amazing, how I could write all this without acting like an idiot and using insults, huh? Why don't you give it a try next time, OK?

If someone disagrees, with my opinion, I'm all open to comments. Just skip insults and idiocy, OK?
I don't know who "your" people are and who you identify with, but since you mentioned a capital, I'm assuming that you are from a country that was at war with Germany. Congratulations, so was half the world. Hitler wasn't murdering them simply because of their religion or wthnicity. He was killing them BECAUSE HE WAS AT WAR WITH THEM.
My assumption may be wrong, but if I'm right, that's a HUGE, FUNDAMENTAL difference.

Not entirely true. The Germans committed mass murder on many Eastern Europeans because they were considered nearly as low as the Jews to them.
The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

You sir, are a liar.

Or you know nothing of WWII and should shut up right about now (not an order, just a suggestion, of course).

Millions of non-Jews were killed specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.
Are incapable of understanding English? Please tell me now which groups of non-Jews were sent to death camps as part of a focused plan of ethnic cleansing in any kinds of numbers that approach the Jewish victims? I know that millions of people were killed because of their ethnicity, and I already discussed it. :roll:

Well, the Gypsies. Not 6 million of them, but their murder was just as systematic.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Well, the Gypsies. Not 6 million of them, but their murder was just as systematic.

Yes, I already mentioned them. Their numbers did not begin to approach the numbers of the Jewish victims. Not it's any less tragic...
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
"Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, including some 100,000 from the Netherlands. "

So, what? When will Jewish activists stop running around whining about Holocaust?

So self centered, only think about themselves and now want the world to feel for them too.

That was pointed out because the girl was Jewish.

As for the rest of your post, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. There is a very active and growing movement in the world that actively denies the holocaust ever happened.
Weren't you the same guy who said not to wallow in our past but to enjoy the present ? Yes... it was the Thanksgiving thread.

EXACTLY...

Shouldn't we be getting over the holocaust Amused? Moving on with our lives? not dredging it up every time some document of the event turns up?

I already answered this. I'll paste it here for you:

Yes, it was. And the Jews are not wallowing in it. They are simply keeping the history from being hijacked by anti-semites with an agenda. The Jews have not let the history of the holocaust keep them down, In fact, they have thrived in spite of it.

I would also like to point out that there are still Jews living that suffered directly from the Holocaust. No Indian can claim that, nor can a black make that claim over slavery.

As long as there are jews alive that suffered directly from the Holocaust, I think it's fine for them to allow that to define their lives. THEY LIVED IT. They are not wallowing in history, they are telling their OWN story.


I don't understand how you see these two cultures as different. Can't it be argued that Native Americans telling are trying to preserve their story as much as the Jews? Can I assume that when all living survivors expire, THEN will be the time when the culture and the world should MOVE ON and not WALLOW?...

You don't see a difference between Jews and American Indians? One culture has thrived and prospered in spite of the VERY RECENT holocaust committed against them. The other has wallowed in their history and, in large part, failed to thrive or prosper for hundreds of years.

And, again, the Jews do not wallow in their history. They do not use it as an excuse for failure.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Well, the Gypsies. Not 6 million of them, but their murder was just as systematic.

Yes, I already mentioned them. Their numbers did not begin to approach the numbers of the Jewish victims. Not it's any less tragic...

right.

but you stated

The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

the Gypsies were killed just for the fact that they were Gypsies. wich is what they are getting at.
 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused

You don't see a difference between Jews and American Indians? One culture has thrived and prospered in spite of the VERY RECENT holocaust committed against them. The other has wallowed in their history and, in large part, failed to thrive or prosper for hundreds of years.

And, again, the Jews do not wallow in their history. They do not use it as an excuse for failure.

The tone of your post would seem to indicate that the nature of the disparity you perceive is grounded in a fundamental disrespect for the culture of Native Americans. Without any other explanation I can only view this as ethnocentric bigotry. Who are you to jusdge the prosperity of a culture... They were perfectly fvcking happy without any Europeans at all.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Amused
Well, the Gypsies. Not 6 million of them, but their murder was just as systematic.

Yes, I already mentioned them. Their numbers did not begin to approach the numbers of the Jewish victims. Not it's any less tragic...

right.

but you stated

The people who were sent to camps and murdered because of their religion and ethnicity were mostly Jews. Yes, he killed POW's, Gypsys, homosexuals and assorted other people who he felt were lower classes of humanity, but their number were dwarfed by the Jews. They were the main focus of the death camps. Of course many millions more were killed during the course of the war, but not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion.

the Gypsies were killed just for the fact that they were Gypsies. wich is what they are getting at.

*Sigh*
I know. And if you read my comment I mentioned just that. I said, they were MOSTLY Jews and that Gypsys too were killed because he felt they were lower class humans. But again, their numbers were dwarfed by the Jewish victims which is what I was getting at.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,923
146
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Amused

You don't see a difference between Jews and American Indians? One culture has thrived and prospered in spite of the VERY RECENT holocaust committed against them. The other has wallowed in their history and, in large part, failed to thrive or prosper for hundreds of years.

And, again, the Jews do not wallow in their history. They do not use it as an excuse for failure.

The tone of your post would seem to indicate that the nature of the disparity you perceive is grounded in a fundamental disrespect for the culture of Native Americans. Without any other explanation I can only view this as ethnocentric bigotry. Who are you to jusdge the prosperity of a culture... They were perfectly fvcking happy without any Europeans at all.

Does your knee hurt after jerking it so hard?

 

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Amused

You don't see a difference between Jews and American Indians? One culture has thrived and prospered in spite of the VERY RECENT holocaust committed against them. The other has wallowed in their history and, in large part, failed to thrive or prosper for hundreds of years.

And, again, the Jews do not wallow in their history. They do not use it as an excuse for failure.

The tone of your post would seem to indicate that the nature of the disparity you perceive is grounded in a fundamental disrespect for the culture of Native Americans. Without any other explanation I can only view this as ethnocentric bigotry. Who are you to jusdge the prosperity of a culture... They were perfectly fvcking happy without any Europeans at all.

Does your knee hurt after jerking it so hard?

As I stated, without any explanation, you get to choose whether or not you explain yourself.. I don't care.
The tone of your posts in the Thanksgiving thread was not what I would have expected from you, so I've had to reasess how I think of you.
The opinion above is how it currently stands, of course it's open to reinterpretation as time goes by...
It's not knee-jerk and I'm aware it's based on limited information.
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
I'm always amazed at how badly people are threatened by Jews. imprezawrxwagon comes off as a whiny child who doesn't get much attention so he resents the people who do.

I'm not surprised he hasn't informed us who is "people" are, but I lost A LOT of relatives in the Holocaust and they lost a lot of friends because they were Jewish. I didn't know them at the time, but I've heard my grandparents speak of their ordeal in the camps and it's not something you just tell someone to get over. As long as there are survivors it will be something that affects a lot of people.
 

Dean

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,757
0
76
Highest Deaths by Country in the Second World War.

USSR: 20.0M
China: 10.45M
Poland: 5.8M
Germany: 5.5M
India: 2.15M
Japan: 1.9M
Yugoslavia: 1.55M
LEVEL 2: ca. 3.8M
LEVEL 3: ca. 0.25M
All TOTAL: 51.4M

These are just estimates i found of course. When I look at the second world war, I don't just only think of the Jewist Holocaust. I think about every poor soul that had his/her life shortened by such a travesty.
 

DBL

Platinum Member
Mar 23, 2001
2,637
0
0
I find it pretty sad that someone felt the need to air their personal grudges against "Jewish Activists" in a thread devoted to the discovery of a journal belonging to a girl who, along with her family, were murdered solely b/c they were Jewish. It's takes a truly ignorant and misguided person to crap on a thread in this manner. You have to know when to pick your fights and I can't imagine a more inappropriate time to air your uninformed criticism.
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: DBL
I find it pretty sad that someone felt the need to air their personal grudges against "Jewish Activists" in a thread devoted to the discovery of a journal belonging to a girl who, along with her family, were murdered solely b/c they were Jewish. It's takes a truly ignorant and misguided person to crap on a thread in this manner. You have to know when to pick your fights and I can't imagine a more inappropriate time to air your uninformed criticism.

so true it hurts :thumbsup:

good post.
 
Jan 8, 2003
593
0
0
Originally posted by: pulse8
I'm always amazed at how badly people are threatened by Jews. imprezawrxwagon comes off as a whiny child who doesn't get much attention so he resents the people who do.

I'm not surprised he hasn't informed us who is "people" are, but I lost A LOT of relatives in the Holocaust and they lost a lot of friends because they were Jewish. I didn't know them at the time, but I've heard my grandparents speak of their ordeal in the camps and it's not something you just tell someone to get over. As long as there are survivors it will be something that affects a lot of people.

Yep, you got my number. I'm a child who seeks attention and is envious of people who actually do get said attention.

I need attention - that is precisely why I have this insanely high post count and why I start endless threads.

I come off as a child - right, especially in a thread where number of people insulted me, I started screaming insults right back at them and generally behave myself in an irrational way.

What can I say? When you are right, you are right.

Oh, btw - your personal very tragic story here - was that an attempt to seek attention, by any chance? Or some people here are genuinely interested in your life story?
 
Jan 8, 2003
593
0
0
Originally posted by: DBL
I find it pretty sad that someone felt the need to air their personal grudges against "Jewish Activists" in a thread devoted to the discovery of a journal belonging to a girl who, along with her family, were murdered solely b/c they were Jewish. It's takes a truly ignorant and misguided person to crap on a thread in this manner. You have to know when to pick your fights and I can't imagine a more inappropriate time to air your uninformed criticism.

What's interesting, is that I feel it is truly evil of said Jewish Activists to promote their agenda, soliciting money and support, while forgetting about other peoples. I can't imagine a more inappropriate way to "remind people of Holocaust" (which is a euphemism for extorting money and special privileges by sending others on a guilt trip).
 

DBL

Platinum Member
Mar 23, 2001
2,637
0
0
Originally posted by: imprezawrxwagon
Originally posted by: DBL
I find it pretty sad that someone felt the need to air their personal grudges against "Jewish Activists" in a thread devoted to the discovery of a journal belonging to a girl who, along with her family, were murdered solely b/c they were Jewish. It's takes a truly ignorant and misguided person to crap on a thread in this manner. You have to know when to pick your fights and I can't imagine a more inappropriate time to air your uninformed criticism.

What's interesting, is that I feel it is truly evil of said Jewish Activists to promote their agenda, soliciting money and support, while forgetting about other peoples. I can't imagine a more inappropriate way to "remind people of Holocaust" (which is a euphemism for extorting money and special privileges by sending others on a guilt trip).

Actually, what is interesting is how you continue to put your foot further and further in your mouth.

 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Originally posted by: Dean
Highest Deaths by Country in the Second World War.

USSR: 20.0M
China: 10.45M
Poland: 5.8M
Germany: 5.5M
India: 2.15M
Japan: 1.9M
Yugoslavia: 1.55M
LEVEL 2: ca. 3.8M
LEVEL 3: ca. 0.25M
All TOTAL: 51.4M

These are just estimates i found of course. When I look at the second world war, I don't just only think of the Jewist Holocaust. I think about every poor soul that had his/her life shortened by such a travesty.


U.S.S.R lost the most because they included the 10 million people Stalin killed himself ;)

Ausm