Frys has the 2TB home versions on sale for $139 now. However, if you were just doing a desktop home system then that would be OK, but be warned about the MTBF. These drives come in two versions : (1) Home & (2) Enterprise. The Enterprise variants (Uktrastar A7K series) have an error rate that is 10X less & has more rigorous tolerance specifications. If you intend to employ these drives in a 24/7 environment, then you need to consider using the Enterprise variant. The lesser mom & pop sold variants assume something like an 8 hr/day useage (ie, not continuous) & the MTBF is unrated.
Just examining that Hitachi spec sheet, it seems that there's really no difference in the drives whatsoever, *but*, if a larger user of drives, ie: Google, were to buy the cheaper ones, and wear them out prematurely, buying the "Desktop" ones would be a reason for them to deny warranty coverage because of over-usage.
The idea that a drive can be manufactured specifically for an 'enterprise' environment, and the same drive can be manufactured for a 'home' environment, with much tighter restrictions, is preposterous.
As for the 1 in 10^14 or 1 in 10^15 bits, 10^14 would imply one bit error every 6.25 times the drive is totally overwritten on a 2Tb drive, which means that, in SMART, these failed reads would show up
many times on a drive that has been in service for 2-3 years. This quite simply isn't happening in any major way. Personally, I'm left to believe that the Ultrastar versus Deskstar thing is little other than a marketing strategy.