Originally posted by: SpazzyChicken
Hey tagej, where did you see that 802.11b is a no-no? I would like to see the info, becuase if that is true, then we might be in some serious sh!t here. But I can't imagine them outlawing such a popular networking tool. There is so much software that is desinged to run on it to help with efficiency.
An article i read on that said the same thing:
If a covered entity assesses the security risks inherent in transmitting protected health information over wireless networks, it will learn that well-known technical deficiencies in the security features of 802.11b technology likely make the technology inadequate, unless it is enhanced. Required technical safeguards that are not met by standard 802.11b wireless network security features include the requirement to implement unique user identification, encryption and decryption, person and entity authentication, and transmission security. The main reason that these requirements cannot be satisfied by deploying only 802.11b technology is that the encryption protocol used in 802.11b products, called Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP), is fundamentally flawed. The deficiencies in WEP have been widely publicized.
Because the deficiencies in WEP are serious and well-known, a covered entity risks being deemed to not be in compliance with HIPAA requirements if it relies on WEP alone to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data transmitted over wireless networks.
HIPAA is a generic standard: The final regulations won't address 802.11 or any other specific technology, since Congress does not want to have to update the rule every time there is a technological advance. That being the case, it is suggested, a good-faith attempt to use available security protocols should be sufficient.