• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary's Senate campaign under probe

burnedout

Diamond Member
U.S. Probes Clinton Senate Campaign

AP via the Washington Post

Associated Press
Wednesday, October 6, 2004; Page A11

The Justice Department is trying to secure the cooperation of an indicted businessman as it pursues Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign for possible fundraising violations, according to interviews and documents.

The FBI told a U.S. magistrate in Los Angeles two years ago that it has evidence Clinton's campaign deliberately understated its fundraising costs so it would have more money to spend on elections. Prosecutors contend that businessman Peter Paul made donations because he wanted a pardon from President Bill Clinton.

Paul has denied he raised money for Mrs. Clinton to boost his chance for a pardon, and he asserted that campaign officials told him the contributions would be disclosed as required by law, his defense team said. He did not receive a pardon. . . . . .
 
Why and how do people get pardoned by a President?

Do you ask for it or know someone?

EDIT:
Also, if you have been convicted, why should they be pardoned and a zillion other people arent?




🙂
 
I'd rather see DeLay's indictment. Let's focus on the most dastardly evil-doers first.

Wasn't Peter Paul's link with Hillary investigated years ago? I remember hearing about him in the news quite a bit back then. What's with the push to re-open it now?
 
I think this is from the "vast conservative conspiracy" to remove democratically-elected Democrats from office department. More appropriate, no?
 
Back
Top