Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Of course, the better question is why feign outrage over this, versus a far more serious civil liberties violation in the formerly covert NSA wiretapping program, which according to the former Quest CEO started before 9/11? You kind of have to question your existence if you're that partisan.
How do you know that the pre 9/11 allegation is more "far more serious"?
There were no details as to what the "request" involved. AFAIK, we still don't know what was requested.
The allegation that it was "illegal" come from a person charged with a serious crime, who said it was a company lawyer that thought it was illegal. We haven't even heard from the lawyer (So far it's heresay There hasn't been any confirmation that there was really a lawyer who thought it was illegal. And since when is some company lawyer the arbiter of wht is illegal?) . We don't know what it was, or why that company lawyer considered it illegal. Could it be more vague?
The incident occured so quickly after GWB was sworn in (less than a month) one has to wonder whether the NSA request was from a Clinton authorized program.
Yet many of the same screaming for GWB's impeachment in that thread are here now pooh-poohing this. Others already saying the whole is a false allegation, a product of some Repub slime machine etc.
Fern