• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

High Tech Condom

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Babbles
Assuming that it actually works, I think it would be an interesting new tool to use in the bedroom. However I think it could be a damper to stop what you are doing to shove some aerosol can into your girl's love shack and fill her up with foam before you do the horizontal tango.
Yea, I think you'd need to get an American women really drunk and horny for them to agree to this.
Which they probably are anyway.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
An employee demonstrates how new liquid condom for women use based on nanometer technology works at a health and reproduction product expo in Beijing November 16, 2005.

:shocked:

:laugh:

Would like to have been there. 😉

HAHah... that's exactly what I was thinking...



Originally posted by: Goosemaster
So how are the women supposed to ...umm..."remove" that stuff?

you will have to buy their other product... "Invisible Condom Remover"
 
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: andylawcc


Originally posted by: Goosemaster
So how are the women supposed to ...umm..."remove" that stuff?

you will have to buy their other product... "Invisible Condom Remover"

"INITIATE VACU-SUCK!" 😀


i would imagine such device would be an one-time-use-only thing. I mean, think about the stuff that's getting sucked out other than the condom, would you want to stick it in again?
 
Well for those that say how much that'd be a damper for the love making, I'd have to say in certain situations it would be a nice and welcomed option.

For instance not all women can use birth control because the negative side effects on their body are to great, that leaves the only option for protection to be a condom and anyone who's had sex with and without a condom clearly knows (man or woman) that it feels much much better without.

This would allow for greater pleasure while still protecting against pregnancy for those that are in committed relationships (or not I guess)

 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: altonb1
Monagamy FTW!

Responsibility FTW!

*Marriage FTW!


*Marriage=1 man + 1 woman

/Flame if you must...

Your personal beliefs are great, I guess, but WTF DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THE THREAD?


It relates because numerous people were discussing it's ability to protect against Sexually Transmitted Diseases. If you are in a married, monogamous relationship, you don't have to worry about an STD.
 
Originally posted by: altonb1
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: altonb1
Monagamy FTW!

Responsibility FTW!

*Marriage FTW!


*Marriage=1 man + 1 woman

/Flame if you must...

Your personal beliefs are great, I guess, but WTF DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THE THREAD?


It relates because numerous people were discussing it's ability to protect against Sexually Transmitted Diseases. If you are in a married, monogamous relationship, you don't have to worry about an STD.
Yes you do. Think about it.
 
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
Originally posted by: altonb1
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: altonb1
Monagamy FTW!

Responsibility FTW!

*Marriage FTW!


*Marriage=1 man + 1 woman

/Flame if you must...

Your personal beliefs are great, I guess, but WTF DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THE THREAD?


It relates because numerous people were discussing it's ability to protect against Sexually Transmitted Diseases. If you are in a married, monogamous relationship, you don't have to worry about an STD.
Yes you do. Think about it.


No, you don't. Unless someone is cheating, the threat of an STD is nil. Note, I specifically said MONOGAMOUS.
 
Back
Top