High speed internet options for people living in the country.

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
My sister and brother-in-law run a very successful business out in the country. A lot of their customers are requesting invoicing and other goodies to be emailed to them, but they can only get conventional dial up service where they live (they have a ranch about 30 miles out of the city). Since some of the files they have to send are rather large (several megs) they are desperate for some sort of highspeed internet service... probably min 256K up, but preferebly faster.

They checked with Satellite (via their TV provider), but the upload speed is still dial up speeds. Another firm mentioned some other satellite 2-way jobbie, but they said it was only twice as fast as dial up (approx 128K, not good enough).

Seems to me there was some other satellite service that rivals DSL/Cable speeds.. but I can't remember the name of it. Anyone know of it or have any other ideas? Cost is not much of an issue (within reason - IE, they aren't going to pay $40K to lay 30 miles of fibre optics to their ranch) but a few K might not be out of the question for the right service.

Thoughts?
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
I can't find the upload speeds on their website, but if its like their TV provider, upload is still dialup speeds.
 

Freejack2

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2000
7,751
8
91
They are working on a wireless technology that isp's could use to distribute bandwith up to 30 or more miles away. It was introduced at CES and will probably start to be more available in a couple of years. Anyone remember the name of it?

Their other option is to purchase a T1. That can cost anywhere from $500 to $1500 depending on what the phone company charges.
 

McCarthy

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,567
0
76
Have them look around for 'wireless DSL' providers. Prices suck compared to wired around here, but then they've been considering sat which isn't exactly a bargain.
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
Most satellite internet (if not all) are worthless for online gaming.

Incredibly high ping times.
 

blackdogdeek

Lifer
Mar 14, 2003
14,453
10
81
Originally posted by: Freejack2
They are working on a wireless technology that isp's could use to distribute bandwith up to 30 or more miles away. It was introduced at CES and will probably start to be more available in a couple of years. Anyone remember the name of it?

Their other option is to purchase a T1. That can cost anywhere from $500 to $1500 depending on what the phone company charges.

wimax?
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: Freejack2
They are working on a wireless technology that isp's could use to distribute bandwith up to 30 or more miles away. It was introduced at CES and will probably start to be more available in a couple of years. Anyone remember the name of it?

Their other option is to purchase a T1. That can cost anywhere from $500 to $1500 depending on what the phone company charges.

yes but now mucn to run a T1 30 miles out to the ranch
 

Frdm51472

Senior member
May 30, 2002
334
0
0
and the cost of the line for the T1 if the fibre loop isnt already nearby. We have a burstable microwave T1 service in this area, requires LOS, but that usually just involves a small tower which can be had fairly cheap, the service runs around $200/month though including a full class c.
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
Originally posted by: Ferocious
Most satellite internet (if not all) are worthless for online gaming.

Incredibly high ping times.
Well, yes, but where did I say they want it for gaming? :confused: They're using it for uploading files. Ping could be a few seconds for all we care... just needs to be fast enough sustained upload speed.
 

amdskip

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
22,530
13
81
Direcway satelite internet sucks and I wouldn't waste my money. I would rather have dial up than that crap.

Don't search necessarily for dsl wireless, rather just a wireless ISP. It may or may not be available and its a good 256k up and down usually and works good.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
sometimes a cost-effective way is to become a mini-isp. Run a t1/t3 out and then have neighbors help with the billing. Depending on size of the 'neighborhood' it may be reasonable.

 

Frdm51472

Senior member
May 30, 2002
334
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
sometimes a cost-effective way is to become a mini-isp. Run a t1/t3 out and then have neighbors help with the billing. Depending on size of the 'neighborhood' it may be reasonable.

Oh how I wish I could talk my neighbours into that. Mmmm T3 for me with bandwidth throttling for them! :)

 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
Originally posted by: Frdm51472
and the cost of the line for the T1 if the fibre loop isnt already nearby. We have a burstable microwave T1 service in this area, requires LOS, but that usually just involves a small tower which can be had fairly cheap, the service runs around $200/month though including a full class c.

^^^
if they need higher upload speed than satellite provides (which on the 2 way systems we tested, was about 100 kbps) , then you should try to find a microwave/LOS provider

another option would be to get a dedicated server in a data center/web hosting center and terminal server/remote desktop into it. the remote desktop session takes little bandwidth and they could do all of the actual sending/recieving on the remote server where they have the bandwidth.
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
Any idea what it would cost to lay a T1 per mile? Is it something prohibitive like $10,000 per mile or $100? I guess the telco would be the people to ask for sure but does anyone have an even rough idea? Someone here work for a telco?
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
Originally posted by: FoBoT
another option would be to get a dedicated server in a data center/web hosting center and terminal server/remote desktop into it. the remote desktop session takes little bandwidth and they could do all of the actual sending/recieving on the remote server where they have the bandwidth.[/quote]
Interesting thought... never thought of it that way. I've got 512 up at my place via DSL, and I could do the hosting from my house... they could use a dialup connection to a small server which is put into my LAN. Hmmm...

Thanks for the thought. That's the kind of outside-the-box thinking I like from some people! :)

 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
Originally posted by: bernse
Originally posted by: FoBoT
another option would be to get a dedicated server in a data center/web hosting center and terminal server/remote desktop into it. the remote desktop session takes little bandwidth and they could do all of the actual sending/recieving on the remote server where they have the bandwidth.
Interesting thought... never thought of it that way. I've got 512 up at my place via DSL, and I could do the hosting from my house... they could use a dialup connection to a small server which is put into my LAN. Hmmm...

Thanks for the thought. That's the kind of outside-the-box thinking I like from some people! :)[/quote]

even better if you can host it yourself. build them a white box server with 1GB of RAM for $500 running Windows Server 2003, have them pay half your ISP cost and there you go.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
I'd steer far away from the satellite services. Just far too little bandwith and FAR to high of latency for the $$. They are terrible. Absolutely terrible. And sadly enough, the tech support is even worse than the service.

I would call your local phone carrier and see what you can do for having a T1 run out. It's going to be high, that is for certain.
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: bernse
Originally posted by: FoBoT
another option would be to get a dedicated server in a data center/web hosting center and terminal server/remote desktop into it. the remote desktop session takes little bandwidth and they could do all of the actual sending/recieving on the remote server where they have the bandwidth.
Interesting thought... never thought of it that way. I've got 512 up at my place via DSL, and I could do the hosting from my house... they could use a dialup connection to a small server which is put into my LAN. Hmmm...

Thanks for the thought. That's the kind of outside-the-box thinking I like from some people! :)

even better if you can host it yourself. build them a white box server with 1GB of RAM for $500 running Windows Server 2003, have them pay half your ISP cost and there you go.[/quote]
The more I look at it, the more I like that idea. My folks are running a small business in Belize (renting suites out) and I was thinking of setting up a website for them too. I could look at starting a small business here and start getting some tax benfits!

I'm going to have to do some checking into stuff here. THanks.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
they could always just get another phone line and run two modems at once. i kinda like the remote desktop idea though, that sounds pretty smart.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Also encourage them to use file compression prior to transmitting large files.