High Schooler Tapes Home Version Of 'Girls Gone Wild'

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
High Schooler Tapes Home Version Of 'Girls Gone Wild'


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- An Albuquerque high school sophomore is in trouble -- for a home video version of "Girls Gone Wild."

Officials at West Mesa High School have suspended the kid for 10 days. He shot his spoof of "Girls Gone Wild" on campus. The parents of one of the girls called police.

An Albuquerque police spokesman says no criminal charges will be filed, because the girls consented to be filmed.

Officials aren't releasing the names of the teenagers involved. School administrators say they haven't seen the video, so they don't know if any of the girls actually flashed on camera.

If they did, officials say the girls could be suspended, too.

Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Are the police even ALLOWED to turn the tape over to the school? Why can the police take the tape if it's legitimate? How long will it be before the .avi is linked here? Who will make the sacrifice?
 

If there's consent to be filmed, is there anything the school can do? WTF, it's not the filmaker's fault that these girls' parents suck at raising kids.
 

bmacd

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
10,869
1
0
i see talent in the kid's future. I would have bought that back in HS :p

-=bmacd=-
 

deftron

Lifer
Nov 17, 2000
10,868
1
0
Originally posted by: yellowfiero

Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Uh, oh... someone's going to a Federal "pound me in the ass" Prison
 

LuNoTiCK

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2001
4,698
0
71
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: bmacd
i see talent in the kid's future. I would have bought that back in HS :p

-=bmacd=-
High school? Hell, I'd buy it now!

:).

Also, it would be funny if the girl whose parents called police got suspended for the tape. Hell, everyone involved in it should be suspended. In fact they don't know if any of the girls actually flashed on camera so what did he do wrong? He was just checking out his videocamera. The school officials didn't even see the tape. I can't see any reason for them to suspend him unless it was on school grounds.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
Are the police even ALLOWED to turn the tape over to the school? Why can the police take the tape if it's legitimate? How long will it be before the .avi is linked here? Who will make the sacrifice?

I didn't think that nudity of anyone under 18 was legal in any way. Isn't that considered child porn? Even if they consent?

Still... that guy's a fuken genius. :D
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Nebor
Are the police even ALLOWED to turn the tape over to the school? Why can the police take the tape if it's legitimate? How long will it be before the .avi is linked here? Who will make the sacrifice?

I didn't think that nudity of anyone under 18 was legal in any way. Isn't that considered child porn? Even if they consent?

Still... that guy's a fuken genius. :D
If they're under 18 I think technically the parents have to consent. But that's only if the tape is to be shown unedited; it's cool if you blur out the offending pixels or edit it otherwise. I mean otherwise entire highschool football tapes would have to be destroyed whenever any freshman streaks the field as part of a hazing.

Pictures of nude youths are legal provided it is entirely non-sexual, be it medical exam photos to nudist family slideshows. As long as the content isn't sexual it's okay. But the parents have the final say-so in the matter.

From the posted text it sounded like all the girls were over 18.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Officials aren't releasing the names of the teenagers involved. School administrators say they haven't seen the video, so they don't know if any of the girls actually flashed on camera.

If they did, officials say the girls could be suspended, too.

I can just see the court case...
Administrator: "Yes, we suspended her because she made a porno"
Lawyer: "Are you sure? Did you actually SEE the video?"
Administrator: "Yes, I did."
Lawyer: "So you're telling me you watched child pornography? Arrest this man!"
 

slick230

Banned
Jan 31, 2003
2,776
0
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Nebor
Are the police even ALLOWED to turn the tape over to the school? Why can the police take the tape if it's legitimate? How long will it be before the .avi is linked here? Who will make the sacrifice?

I didn't think that nudity of anyone under 18 was legal in any way. Isn't that considered child porn? Even if they consent?

Still... that guy's a fuken genius. :D

Well, I don't think that had probably stopped you from scouring the 'Net for every supposed naked pic or nip slip pic of Lindsay Lohan, now has it? ;)
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: slick230
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Nebor
Are the police even ALLOWED to turn the tape over to the school? Why can the police take the tape if it's legitimate? How long will it be before the .avi is linked here? Who will make the sacrifice?

I didn't think that nudity of anyone under 18 was legal in any way. Isn't that considered child porn? Even if they consent?

Still... that guy's a fuken genius. :D

Well, I don't think that had probably stopped you from scouring the 'Net for every supposed naked pic or nip slip pic of Lindsay Lohan, now has it? ;)

I have all of six images that I've scoured the net for when it comes to Lindsay Lohan, and they're all clean wallpapers made by other people. Everything else has been sent to me.