High School Student Might Have Found Cure For Cancer

Cal166

Diamond Member
May 6, 2000
5,081
8
81
http://wgrd.com/high-school-student-might-have-found-cure-for-cancer-video/

This is a pretty amazing video. This girl is only in high school and may have come up with the solution for a cure to cancer. Share this with people as this is extremely amazing and great news for all of us that have been affected by the scourge that is cancer. 17-year-old Angela Zhang of Cupertino of California, just won $100,000 in the national Siemens science contest for potentially finding the cure.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
and now siemens owns the patent and will bury it never to be seen again to support their cronies at bayer who make expensive chemotherapy drugs


/conspiracy
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
Hallelujah. I can finally start smoking.
The cancer is caused by the smoke, not the nicotine. You can still use nicotine inhalers, patches, and gum if you want nicotine. I'm sucking on a nicotine inhaler right now, but I've never smoked.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
So I assume she found a way to prevent a very specific pathway that cancer develops from the other 10,000 pathways that cancer has in order to become malignant.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
So I assume she found a way to prevent a very specific pathway that cancer develops from the other 10,000 pathways that cancer has in order to become malignant.

nope

what she found is a potential way to mark individual cancer cells in the body. using that same compound that marks the cells, you can deliver medicine in a pinpoint manner. so you'll still need something to kill the cancer cell but it can probably be fairly potent.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
nope

what she found is a potential way to mark individual cancer cells in the body. using that same compound that marks the cells, you can deliver medicine in a pinpoint manner. so you'll still need something to kill the cancer cell but it can probably be fairly potent.

Well they've definitely done something like that before. What's different this time?
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
nope

what she found is a potential way to mark individual cancer cells in the body. using that same compound that marks the cells, you can deliver medicine in a pinpoint manner. so you'll still need something to kill the cancer cell but it can probably be fairly potent.

I remember reading something like this about several dozen times over the past couple of years.

They all use different techniques to do the same thing, and they all still haven't produced progress.

It sounds pessimistic, but cancer is not created the same. They don't all the exact same markings that differentiate them from healthy cells. Its one of the reasons cancer hasn't been cured, its fucking hard to differentiate them from normal stuff and a marking technique might work for one specific type of cell but be wholly useless for another type. And in that case, it JUST MIGHT start making healthy cells for destruction.
 

Anonemous

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
7,361
1
71
Wasn't this posted like over a few months ago?

Like the above guy says everyone's cancer is different and will require genomic screening to personalize the treatment the patient gets since not all cancer's mutate the same way.
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
I guess we'll see, seems like more of the same science thats been done even for a couple years
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
This 'cure for cancer/aids' type story pops up every few months but nothing ever comes of it.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
"Angela recently entered her project in the national Siemens science contest. It was no contest. She got a check for $100,000 and promptly bought about a dozen more pairs of shoes."

I wonder how they know about the grading criteria for Siemens...

The Bio category is so heavily contested. So many different "cures" for cancer, diabetus, obesity.
 
Last edited:

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
and now siemens owns the patent and will bury it never to be seen again to support their cronies at bayer who make expensive chemotherapy drugs


/conspiracy

Yep. There's no money in curing cancer. There is trillions in "Treatment".
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
Yep. There's no money in curing cancer. There is trillions in "Treatment".

How would you proceed with a research and development program to develop a cure instead of a treatment? What would you do that's different from what's already done or being done?
 
Last edited:

MaxFusion16

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2001
1,512
1
0
surprise surprise, another asian kid.

and no she hasn't found the cure for cancer.

I also bet that her parents had a hand in this, probably work at the lab and got her access or something.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
surprise surprise, another asian kid.

and no she hasn't found the cure for cancer.

I also bet that her parents had a hand in this, probably work at the lab and got her access or something.

Just read a descrip on the Siemens site, she did the work at Stanford under a prof there.
http://www.siemens-foundation.org/en/competition/2011_winners.htm

And you're correct, this isn't a cure for cancer. It's pretty clever, but it's probably not even a large improvement in treatment.
 

Anonemous

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
7,361
1
71
surprise surprise, another asian kid.

and no she hasn't found the cure for cancer.

I also bet that her parents had a hand in this, probably work at the lab and got her access or something.

It's not what you know, it's WHO you know. Connections will get you farther than skill sadly.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
The cancer is caused by the smoke, not the nicotine. You can still use nicotine inhalers, patches, and gum if you want nicotine. I'm sucking on a nicotine inhaler right now, but I've never smoked.

Cancers of mouth and throat are often attributed to chewing and dipping tobacco.