• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

"High Jack This, Fags"

ShadowBlade

Diamond Member
EDIT: The opinion below isn't mine, I'm cool with the signing. Some of you are so easy to get a rise out of, LOL. Go surf for some pics of Britney or something, take that edge off.



What do you think of this?

One opinon:

Assuming the photo is accurate, I am disappointed and disgusted by this behavior for two reasons. First, the message invokes an epithet that is extremely insulting to hundreds of thousands of members of the armed forces and the public at large and uses it as a general term of hatred towards America's military enemies. The message also creates a hostile work environment for many servicemen and women and other military employees.

Second, I am concerned about the larger issue presented here. I'm sure that the practice of "signing" bombs is intended to produce some morale-boosting effect for those involved, but I imagine that many such messages tend to express hatred or malice towards the ethnic or national group represented by the enemy. Of course, we wouldn't be bombing people we particularly liked, but I think it's also important to separate America's military objectives from our individual emotional responses to the acts of war that triggered this and other strikes. We must also separate the military targets we are attacking from the people and country that surrounds them. I don't believe the United States Navy hates anyone, and I don't believe it is becoming of Navy personnel to use military equipment to convey a personal message of hatred. That the author chose a phrase that disparaged a group of people unrelated to the current operation - and misspelled a common word in it at that - adds even more embarrassment and insult.

Particularly in this dark hour, the Navy and our country's entire armed forces are representing us with honor around the world. It sickens me that one or more Navy people like the author of the above message would tarnish the image of the many heroes who defend our nation every day.

Can any of you provide me with the Navy's policies, if any, regarding acts by personnel that disparage or degrade others based on sexual orientation, as well as the Navy's policies, if any, regarding "signing" equipment with personal messages such as the one pictured in the above photo?
 
Cleveland: The only British idiom I know is that "i love you" means "cigarette."
Peter: Well, someone tell this "cigarette" to shut up.
 
I think it's cool.
I don't think the bomb was literally programmed to target homosexuals, it was probably just the quickest insult he could come up with.
I doubt that the intended target even involved man-on-man sex.
 
Back
Top