"Lower cost of entry" is often touted as a reason to go with an i7-860/p55 combo over in i7-920/x58 combo. However, there are a few high-end (and high-cost) p55 mobos out there. Boards like the ASUS P7P55D-E Premium and the MSI Big Bang Trinergy are pushing $300. In other words, they're in x58 territory cost-wise. Go this route and all of a sudden an 860/p55 combo may be more expensive.
Obviously the x58 platform has some inherent advantages like triple-channel memory and full 16x/16x PCI-e, so if you know you're going to need one of those features (if you're going to be using Crossfire, for instance) then the choice becomes pretty clear. Not everyone is going to be utilizing those features, however, and these high-end boards boast some seemingly impressive features of their own (extra OC controls, enhanced on-board sound, SLI capability in the case of the Trinergy).
So I'm curious. Do you take the view that, if you're going to spend all that money, you should be buying into the x58 platform? Or do you feel that the features being offered on these expensive p55 mobos justifies splurging on them?
Obviously the x58 platform has some inherent advantages like triple-channel memory and full 16x/16x PCI-e, so if you know you're going to need one of those features (if you're going to be using Crossfire, for instance) then the choice becomes pretty clear. Not everyone is going to be utilizing those features, however, and these high-end boards boast some seemingly impressive features of their own (extra OC controls, enhanced on-board sound, SLI capability in the case of the Trinergy).
So I'm curious. Do you take the view that, if you're going to spend all that money, you should be buying into the x58 platform? Or do you feel that the features being offered on these expensive p55 mobos justifies splurging on them?