- Dec 26, 2000
- 64
- 0
- 0
I have an IBM Deskstar 34GXP hard drive (model DPTA-373420).  On the IBM website, the capacity of this drive is listed at 34.21 GB.
I formatted the drive as FAT32 in DOS. When in Windows, the capacity of the drive is listed as 31.5GB. When I saw this I figured that the missing 2.7GB must have been used to store the file allocation tables on the drive.
Then I read a Microsoft article on the benefits of NTFS vs. FAT32. In the article it says that: "You cannot format a volume larger than 32 GB in size using the FAT32 file system in Windows 2000".
So, my question is: Am I being robbed of 2.7GB of space because I am using FAT32? Would I get it back if I switched to NTFS?
Thanks
			
			I formatted the drive as FAT32 in DOS. When in Windows, the capacity of the drive is listed as 31.5GB. When I saw this I figured that the missing 2.7GB must have been used to store the file allocation tables on the drive.
Then I read a Microsoft article on the benefits of NTFS vs. FAT32. In the article it says that: "You cannot format a volume larger than 32 GB in size using the FAT32 file system in Windows 2000".
So, my question is: Am I being robbed of 2.7GB of space because I am using FAT32? Would I get it back if I switched to NTFS?
Thanks
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter