Hezbollah moves toward Lebanon government control

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Freshgeardude

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2006
4,506
0
76
its to bad israel doesnt have an SSBN or two. Although from what I understand, they do have a few dolphin class subs. Not sure if those kinds of subs can be equiped with SLBM nukes though. Perhaps someone with knowledge on the subject here can tell us.


I do believe the subs that Israel has carry nuclear tipped missles.

it would be israel's first move with nukes because if a nuke fell on israel, the subs would be able to fire back
 

Karl Agathon

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2010
1,081
0
0
I do believe the subs that Israel has carry nuclear tipped missles.

it would be israel's first move with nukes because if a nuke fell on israel, the subs would be able to fire back


From what ive read since I last posted, it does seem those class of subs can cdeliver nuclear tipped missles. im glad Israel has that kind of second strike capability. Her enemies most likely know about thet as well, which im sure would give them at least a little peause before crossing a line they can never go back on.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Actually bfdd said it best -- LL, do you acknowledge that if Israel so wished Palestine and the Palestinians wouldn't exist? That the Israelis, if they chose to be so brutal, could waltz into Gaza and the West Bank and annihilate everyone and everything there? That they could have leveled Lebanon if they so wished? The fact is they could have if they wanted to and there isn't a fucking thing anyone could have done to stop them. Sure after the fact the world would be pissed and act, but not until after the Israeli's killed every single Palestinian and wiped them off the face of the Earth.

If you acknowledge that Israel has that kind of power, then it should be obvious by the fact they haven't used it that they are showing restraint because if Israel was lobbing rockets into Iran like the Palestinians were into Israel I highly doubt the Iranians would twiddle their thumbs and try to organize peace talks.


As ole Ben Grimm use to say -- nuff said!!

Well said.

I was reading about El Alamein the other day. During one of the English's reversals the Special Interrogation Group was stood down and sent into Palestine because as persons whose ethnic and/or religious histories were anathema to the Nazis they faced torture and/or extermination. All except the Jews, that is. The Jews were forced to stay in Cyrenaica because of the stringent laws against Jews emigrating into Palestine, even though they had served behind Axis lines doing some of the most dangerous missions possible (and often in enemy uniform, which means summary execution is perfectly legal under the laws of war.) Even though the Jews of the SIG were almost all FROM the Palestinian mandate. The Arabs of the SIG and other special forces irregulars were allowed to go into Palestine - even those recruited from other places.

Point is, whatever the Israelis have, they EARNED, and they retain it only because the Palestinians have never been strong enough to take it away. Whatever the Palestinians have, it's because the Israelis have not used the myriad provocations as an excuse to take it away, even though they have the strength. If the Palestinians laid down their arms and embraced peace, there would be peace tomorrow. If the Israelis laid down their arms, the land would be poisoned with Jewish blood. There is simply no moral comparison.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
From what ive read since I last posted, it does seem those class of subs can cdeliver nuclear tipped missles. im glad Israel has that kind of second strike capability. Her enemies most likely know about thet as well, which im sure would give them at least a little peause before crossing a line they can never go back on.

No, it's not a second strike option. Israel says it will nuke any country that threatens it's existence
Read up on the Samson option.
 

Karl Agathon

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2010
1,081
0
0
No, it's not a second strike option. Israel says it will nuke any country that threatens it's existence
Read up on the Samson option.

Just a partial quote from wiki:

"the Samson Option, refers to the nuclear strategy whereby Israel would launch a massive nuclear retaliatory strike if the state itself was being overrun, just as the Biblical figure Samson is said to have pushed apart the pillars of a Philistine temple, bringing down the roof and killing himself and thousands of Philistines who had gathered to see him humiliated."

Their subs are also used for in part for a second strike capability deterent. Say a country (Iran for example) launches nukes at Israel. Even if all of israel was destroyed, those subs would be used for second strike capability. Now of course they could also be used as a first strike as well.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
What a crock a shit the biblical myth of Samson is now from begging to end.

As we recall that biblical myth, that fem fantale, Delah gave ole Samson a haircut and made Samson weak. And then chained him up, to the temple. But wait, ole Delah forgot to keep reapplying that haircut to keep Samson weak. So Samson committed suicide, pulled down the entire temple down with him, to take his enemies with him.

But wait, I thought Israel was a 100% foursquare against suicide bombing. And now Israel threatens the nuclear option just to kill millions of people rather than admit to its own duplicity.

More Rocky and Bunwinkle fractured fairy tales.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
What a crock a shit the biblical myth of Samson is now from begging to end.

As we recall that biblical myth, that fem fantale, Delah gave ole Samson a haircut and made Samson weak. And then chained him up, to the temple. But wait, ole Delah forgot to keep reapplying that haircut to keep Samson weak. So Samson committed suicide, pulled down the entire temple down with him, to take his enemies with him.

But wait, I thought Israel was a 100% foursquare against suicide bombing. And now Israel threatens the nuclear option just to kill millions of people rather than admit to its own duplicity.

More Rocky and Bunwinkle fractured fairy tales.
WTF? "If the state itself was being overrun" /= "admit to its own duplicity". That a stretch in Jew-hating even for you. You also misspelled "Delilah" and misquoted the story - Samson's strength did not return from regrowing his hair, but because he prayed to G-d for strength to be avenged upon the Philistines.

But hey, at least you've still got your hate, Sunshine. :D
 

Oric

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
897
66
91
Those who live with the sword, die by the sword.

Israel should think about soft power and good relations to get along with threats ...

Step #1 : No more settlements outside a drawn border. Has the population in Israel become so dense that new settlements are built on Palestine land ?

Israel uses its nuclear backed military machine to invade not to protect as ,t stands today.

Jediyoda : I am still waiting for your answer about your nationality. Is it that much a secret ?
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Those who live with the sword, die by the sword.

Israel should think about soft power and good relations to get along with threats ...

Step #1 : No more settlements outside a drawn border. Has the population in Israel become so dense that new settlements are built on Palestine land ?

Israel uses its nuclear backed military machine to invade not to protect as ,t stands today.

Jediyoda : I am still waiting for your answer about your nationality. Is it that much a secret ?

I think Israel should come out and tell the Palestinians they have 6 months to come to the tables and work out an agreement. In these 6 months Israel will not build any further settlements and previously built settlements will be dealt with as part of the negotiations.


Oh wait they did that.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
Jediyoda : I am still waiting for your answer about your nationality. Is it that much a secret ?



hahaha..overlooked your one question post....

I am a Jew! I am a citizen of Israel and Poland and the United States where I live 6 months out of the year. My son is in the IDF. I own homes in Tel Aviv and Poland and the US!! I will be visiting my Son in a few months.

My mother and father were both Jews. My mother was Polish and my father was American!
 

mjrpes3

Golden Member
Oct 2, 2004
1,876
1
0
The same goes with Hamas in '08.
They came across the borders in an act of war, kidnapping an Israeli soldier. That is provocation. Knowing that Israel would not accept what happened, but underestimating what Israel's reaction would be. That is what triggered your Rape of Gaza and nothing else.

Prior to that there were no military conflicts that required Israel to cross the border in Gaza.

Gilad Shalit was kidnapped in 2006, not 2008.

And you missed a fact:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5112846.stm

So let me go ahead a fix your post

Israel came across the borders in an act of war, kidnapping two suspected Hamas members. That is provocation. Knowing that Hamas would not accept what happened, but underestimating what Hama's reaction would be.

Prior to that there were no military conflicts that required Hamas to cross the border into Israel.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
You shouldn`t be so quick to jump on a typo, especially when Common Courtesy is still correct....which you probably did not know..lol


Originally Posted by Common Courtesy



The same goes with Hamas in '08.
They came across the borders in an act of war, kidnapping an Israeli soldier. That is provocation. Knowing that Israel would not accept what happened, but underestimating what Israel's reaction would be. That is what triggered your Rape of Gaza and nothing else.

Prior to that there were no military conflicts that required Israel to cross the border in Gaza.

Let me fix this for you mjrpes3 -- just because CC had a typo you jusmped all over it without knowing anything that happenned in 2008 -- so we will change the typo --


Originally Posted by Common Courtesy -- The same goes with Hamas in '06.
They came across the borders in an act of war, kidnapping an Israeli soldier. That is provocation. Knowing that Israel would not accept what happened, but underestimating what Israel's reaction would be. That is what triggered your Rape of Gaza and nothing else.

Prior to that there were no military conflicts that required Israel to cross the border in Gaza.

Also Hamas did break the ceasefire in 2008.
Also -- On 4 November 2008, the Israeli military invaded Gaza Strip, entering at least 250 meters inside Palestinian Territory searching for a tunnel. The IDF stated that it was intended for the capture of Israeli soldiers and that it intended to continue with the truce, calling the raid a "pinpoint operation".[33] Hamas and, according to an allegation by The Huffington Post, one IDF source maintained that it was for defensive purposes.[34] As six members of Hamas were killed,[6][35] Hamas stated that the attack was a "massive breach of the truce".[36] Rocket attacks towards Israeli cities around Gaza increased sharply in November 2008, approaching the pre-truce levels.[37] According to a 17 November article in The Telegraph, "since violence flared on 5 Nov, Israeli forces and militants, some of them from Hamas, have engaged in almost daily tit-for-tat exchanges."[38]
 

mjrpes3

Golden Member
Oct 2, 2004
1,876
1
0
My post had nothing to do with 2008.

Hint #1: Israel kidnapped two suspected Hamas members on June 24, 2006
Hint #2: Hamas kidnapped an Israeli soldier on June 25, 2006
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Israel does not need to commit genocide.

Scorched earth will work just as well.

They will not do it because of the exact reason you pointed out - history.
However, the Hamas is not bound by such history.

Actions by the Palestinians and/or lack of them will not stop Israel from continuing to absorb territory on the West Bank.

The Palestinians have their destiny in their hands - but seem to be unable to do anything with it by choice.

Hezbollah at least has tried to work and setup a government. Now time will tell how well they succeed.
Israel isn't anything in history. It's a man-made state after World War II.

-John
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
From what I understand, Tel-Aviv is a very beautiful modern city.

fantastic place with a lovely energy. I was lucky to spend a few summers there studying music. Some cities are imbued with a natural glow and Tel-Aviv is one..
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Or would they be hidden by the great wall of Israel?

Religous rapture, perhaps?

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Cause for sure, Tel-Aviv, and or any Israel city is not normal. It's an enclave for people of one religious stripe, fighting against people of another religious stripe.

-John
 

Oric

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
897
66
91
I think Israel should come out and tell the Palestinians they have 6 months to come to the tables and work out an agreement. In these 6 months Israel will not build any further settlements and previously built settlements will be dealt with as part of the negotiations.


Oh wait they did that.

Why are they building settlements and expanding their territory. THAT was my question.

Jediyoda thanks for the detaled answer ...
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Here in America, we give religion a pass. Along with, race, color, and creed.

-John
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Cause for sure, Tel-Aviv, and or any Israel city is not normal. It's an enclave for people of one religious stripe, fighting against people of another religious stripe.

-John

Jeruselm was the same way - one religion city until Jordan ceded the West Bank to Israel.

Only then were all three religions able to access the city.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Why are they building settlements and expanding their territory. THAT was my question.

An answer; may not be the PC one and tick off the Palestinians supporters
Territory is available; not controlled by another country - already bought and paid for by Israeli blood multiple times.

Religious inference is that they should expand into the West Bank as much as possible
1) To help with the trip wire/defense of Israel
2) To expand the settled border of Israel
3) To piss off the Arabs that tried to destroy Israel (payback)