Hey, We'll Just Mind . . .

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Fighting to Be Righteous . . .


Now, I for one don't think it's really anybody's business but the parties involved, but what the hell, grab a handbasket
& let's get on down the road to hell.


Hey ! - You ! Religious Fruitcakes - mind your own business and leave the rest of the world alone.
If they're not packin' you, who cares who they're packin'.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What a nice big blank page.

It should link to CBS Channel 11 in Dallas, here's the content of the article -


DALLAS A legal battle is being fought in court over a Dallas church's right to expose an extra-marital affair.

The lawsuit stems from an act of adultery allegedly committed by a member of Watermark Community Church, in Dallas.

Part of the suit has been sealed including the name of the accused. The man is simply known as John Doe.

According to Watermark's pastor the church has a moral obligation to intervene.

?No, we're not overreacting. Whenever someone is practicing behavior that is detrimental to themselves, to their testimony as a follower of Christ, it's damaging to other people and hurts their own ability to be a witness to Christ. I don't think you can overreact,? said Todd Wagner.

Pastor Wagner says the bible calls for several steps. In this case Wagner says he had a one on one discussion with John Doe. After that, several other members of the church stepped in.

According to Wagner both attempts failed to stop the affair. ?And so sometimes we put things in writing to our little community so that we can all agree that we have processed this well, we've thought threw this through, and this is the right way to love this person.?

In other words, Watermark attempted to send a letter to its church members informing them that John Doe refused to end his affair.

That action was met with resistance and a temporary restraining order was placed on the letter. The church appealed and won; now John Doe is appealing that ruling while the letter waits in limbo.

The attorney for John Doe declined an on-camera interview but tells CBS 11 News that his client made his disclosure in confidence similar to a confession to a priest.

The attorney says he is disappointed that the church wants to publicize something that is clearly confidential. Attorneys representing Watermark say the case comes down to the separation of church and state.

?Under the constitution, and it's been this way since our founding, the government is prohibited from getting involved into the internal operations of the church,? said Hiram Sasser, Liberty Legal Institute.

In a similar case the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments involving another local church. In that situation a woman sued a Fort Worth church after the minister distributed an open letter discussing her alleged affair.



 

pinion9

Banned
May 5, 2005
1,201
0
0
If I was having an affair and my friends found out about it, they would tell my wife. I don't think there is a damn thing I could do about it.

The church should just send the letter. It is only libel if it is untrue AND they had malicious intent. Send the damn letter or make a Sunday announcement "...again, that will be at the Golden Heart Park next Saturday from 2-6. Also, John is filling out Marie like a job application and refuses to stop. If you see his wife let her know. Beth Stevens would like you all to say a prayer for her daughter who has ca..."
 

BriGy86

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2004
4,537
1
91
Originally posted by: pinion9
If I was having an affair and my friends found out about it, they would tell my wife. I don't think there is a damn thing I could do about it.

The church should just send the letter. It is only libel if it is untrue AND they had malicious intent. Send the damn letter or make a Sunday announcement "...again, that will be at the Golden Heart Park next Saturday from 2-6. Also, John is filling out Marie like a job application and refuses to stop. If you see his wife let her know. Beth Stevens would like you all to say a prayer for her daughter who has ca..."

i like that approach
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
?No, we're not overreacting.

Whenever someone is practicing behavior that is detrimental to themselves, to their testimony as a follower of Christ, it's damaging to other people and hurts their own ability to be a witness to Christ.

I don't think you can overreact,? said Todd Wagner.


Pastor Wagner says the bible calls for several steps.
======================================================

I hope the Texas Supreme Court sides with the Church and everyone in Texas is miserable.

They deserve the best Church and Government oversight and intrusion money can buy.

:laugh:
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Whatever happened to, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone?" The preacher's a self-righteous prick. :roll:
 

akenbennu

Senior member
Jul 24, 2005
771
345
136
Given the stories about the bishops covering up for the priests all over the country in the last few years, claiming that you have a duty to speak out just doesn't carry a whole lot of weight.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Yes, I think the Church or anyone is free to tell anyone about someones affair.
Yes, I think the people in this Church are not following the teachings and examples of Jesus Christ.
Yes, I think it shows the perversion of Christianity that is rampant in America.