Herman Cain accused by SEVERAL women of inappropriate behavior

[shira]

“These are old and tired allegations that never stood up to the facts,” Gordon wrote in an email response. “This was settled amicably among all parties many years ago, and dredging this up now is merely part of a smear campaign meant to discredit a true patriot who is shaking up the political status quo.”

Gordon added: “Since critics haven’t had much luck in attacking Mr. Cain’s ideas, they are trying to attack him personally.”


^ That's the sum of it right there.

Right. Critics have had no luck at all exposing 9-9-9 for the money-transfer-to-the-rich that it actually is.

 

[xBiffx]

I agree the Devil is in the details and if he is going to be a potential POTUS he is going to go through a serious vetting process.

Double standard detected. Alert! Alert!

 

[Ausm]

Double standard detected. Alert! Alert!

Moran detected ...no alert needed :\

 

[Jaskalas]

You know what today's headline would have been otherwise?

CAIN TOPS PERRY -- IN TEXAS...

 

[Ausm]

You know what today's headline would have been otherwise?

CAIN TOPS PERRY -- IN TEXAS...

I bet Spidey will go fetal when he reads that!

 

[UberNeuman]

"Hey baby - you wanna come up to my room and raise a little Cain?""​

 

[thraashman]

You know, there's so many perfectly horrible things about Herman Cain to attack. Basically every thing he's said or done so far has him as a xenophobic, muslim hating sociopath with absolutely no even remotely good ideas. So these allegations just come off as pointless. Hell, these are step towards good in comparison to everything else about him. These allegations show he to me that he lowers his crazy around women apparantly in comparison to its normal levels.

 

[Howard]

My question is where would a good one come from?:awe:

New Hampshire?

 

[PokerGuy]

I see the left wing media has decided to start the Clarence Thomas treatment of Cain.....

 

[xBiffx]

I see the left wing media has decided to start the Clarence Thomas treatment of Cain.....

Except that, without a doubt, Anita Hill was innocent and told the truth. :whiste:

 

[senseamp]

 

[Matt1970]

As long as he isn't associated with a domestic terrorist or with a group convicted of voter faud. That would probably be bad for a Presidential Candidate.

 

[xBiffx]

As long as he isn't associated with a domestic terrorist or with a group convicted of voter faud. That would probably be bad for a Republican Presidential Candidate.

FTFY. But I did LOL @ the original. :awe:

 

[Baked]

Were these white women, at the same time?

 

[Karl Agathon]

“These are old and tired allegations that never stood up to the facts,” Gordon wrote in an email response. “This was settled amicably among all parties many years ago, and dredging this up now is merely part of a smear campaign meant to discredit a true patriot who is shaking up the political status quo.”

Gordon added: “Since critics haven’t had much luck in attacking Mr. Cain’s ideas, they are trying to attack him personally.”


^ That's the sum of it right there.

+1

Right now, there are left and some right wing big wigs behind the scenes sayng "uh oh, Hermans become to popular and isnt running a traditional campain, we have to nip this in the bud really fast. The american people arent listening to us or the media"

 

[Munky]

So what? Until these accusations can be legally proven, it's nothing more than some guy accusing Herman Cain of cutting him in the lunch line 10 years ago. Not that I was gonna vote for him anyways.

 

[dmcowen674]

Herman Cain accused by two women of inappropriate behaviorhttp://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67194.html

He's rich, there will always be people accusing the rich of "inappropriate behavior".

 

[OutHouse]

I did not read it all but did the woman he allegedly pick up work for him? If that is the case then he is in serious trouble.

lol, serious trouble? why and by who?

 

[OutHouse]

So what? Until these accusations can be legally proven, it's nothing more than some guy accusing Herman Cain of cutting him in the lunch line 10 years ago. Not that I was gonna vote for him anyways.

again, what needs to be proven legally?

 

[Munky]

again, what needs to be proven legally?

It needs to be proven that he actually did the things he's being accused of.

 

[OutHouse]

It needs to be proven that he actually did the things he's being accused of.

prove what and why does it need to be proven?


telling dirty jokes and asking a woman for a convention romp his hotel room? Really?????

i really dont understand what the big fuss is about. now if he is accused of rape or fucking donkeys fresh from Tijuana then this story may interest me. as far as i am concerned he did what a lot of convention go'ers do.

 

[Munky]

prove what and why does it need to be proven?


telling dirty jokes and asking a woman for a convention romp his hotel room? Really?????

i really dont understand what the big fuss is about. now if he is accused of rape or fucking donkeys fresh from Tijuana then this story may interest me. as far as i am concerned he did what a lot of convention go'ers do.

It's not a big fuss, and that was my point. It's especially not a big fuss when all you have to go on are accusations from one side. If these women decide to make it a big fuss, then they will need to prove it. Got that yet?

 

[Ausm]

New Hampshire?

Republican?

 

[UberNeuman]

"Hey sugar - you wanna squeeze my caine?"​

 

[OrByte]

lol!!