Here's what w00t has to say...

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

Mik3y

Banned
Mar 2, 2004
7,089
0
0
LOPPYASHELL: i dont want to get banned..
Im Mik3y: u wont, just make a thread for apologizing
LOPPYASHELL: apologize to him
LOPPYASHELL: lol
LOPPYASHELL: ya right
LOPPYASHELL: apolgize to me
Im Mik3y: just apologize in general
LOPPYASHELL: lol fvck no
Im Mik3y: pussy!
LOPPYASHELL: i would rather die than apologize to that d!ckhead of an admin
LOPPYASHELL: fvcking nerd thinks he is cool
LOPPYASHELL: but u know in reality he is a fvcking loser
LOPPYASHELL: The door is that way, don't let it hit you in the backside on the way out. See you in 2 weeks.

Mean Mod
Im Mik3y: oh wow
LOPPYASHELL: if he bans me
Im Mik3y: where'd u get that from?
LOPPYASHELL: he edited my post
LOPPYASHELL: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=38&threadid=1531359
LOPPYASHELL: look at my post
LOPPYASHELL: if he bans me he will be my worst enemy
LOPPYASHELL: he will pay
LOPPYASHELL: he will
LOPPYASHELL: yep
LOPPYASHELL: i got banned
Im Mik3y: haha
LOPPYASHELL: i got fvcking banned
Im Mik3y: only for 2 weeks
Im Mik3y: what's it like to get banned?
LOPPYASHELL: For what?
Im Mik3y: it wont let u log in?
LOPPYASHELL: i am
LOPPYASHELL: it wont let me post
Im Mik3y: he banned u for spamming actually
Im Mik3y: and making random posts
LOPPYASHELL: wow
LOPPYASHELL: what a d!ckhead
Im Mik3y: lol
LOPPYASHELL: u know the fvcking nerd is having fun
LOPPYASHELL: its fvcking sad
Im Mik3y: haha
LOPPYASHELL: he is like hehe i banned a 15 year old i am so cool
LOPPYASHELL: man lets go watch star wars
Im Mik3y: haha
LOPPYASHELL: play some tetris
LOPPYASHELL: mommy can u make me some mini pizza's
LOPPYASHELL: he is 43 and still lives with his mom i bet


so ya, he really means to apologize. :)
 
A

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
Did he get a ban? Cuz it's gonna be a permaban after that.

I bet he thinks Nik is a mod after the teamspeak bit.
 
ActuaryTm

ActuaryTm

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2003
6,858
12
81
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
this thread is going places.
Click to expand...
As much as a thread about a 15 year old script kiddie can...
Click to expand...
Why the hell are you not in TeamSpeak and/or Skype?
Click to expand...
Confirmed. We could use another southerner to keep ulfwald company (his wife had to go to bed and/or slop the pigs).
 
D

DJFuji

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
3,643
1
76
Is it just me or is ATOT kind of fascist with the moderating? Mods seem to have absolute, anonymous power, answer to nobody, and have pretty much free reign here. I can understand completely if a mod tempbans someone for an attitude problem or something (i.e. woot), but it seems like they also ban somewhat arbitrarily. If someone asks a legitimate question and is civil about it, i don't think that's grounds for a ban IMO. I dont hang out in P&N so I havent actually seen any abuse firsthand, but it's the whole "don't ever question my authority or ask about my decisions because that insolence will not be tolerated" thing that makes it feel like fascism sometimes.

IMO it'd be better if we KNEW who the mods were. The lack of anonymity usually prevents some of the "god complex" that can develop when people can anonymously punish others without beind held accoutable for their actions. It reminds me of being an NCO in the Marine Corps. I had a lot of power over my troops but they answered to me and I answered to my superiors. If word got out that I was abusive or unfair, I would have to answer for my actions. The biggest leadership problems I've seen occurred when you had a poor or unfair leader in charge of Marines who didn't have his or her own superior to report to. Thus, they had virtually absolute power and many times that would cause major problems within a unit. The only saving grace was that a) Marines rotate on a regular basis so he would never be there forever, and b) we had a system called 'request mast' which would allow any Marine to voice a legitimate complaint and it would be taken up the chain of command until it was resolved in a satisfactory manner. So if he took it to his immediate superior and his superior dismissed it, said superiod would still be required to forward it to HIS superior for further action or until it was resolved.

While ATOT is certainly not the military, it does sometimes appear to be nazi in nature. The very fact that I could be punished for posting this should be sufficient evidence. I am not being offensive, rude, or even belligerent by this post but yet I am likely to be punished for for my "insolence." It surprises me that with the number of liberal and intellectual people here, there isn't an uproar caused by this type of behavior. Imagine if police officers had that kind of power. Where you could never report an officer for anything and he was under no rules at all to be fair. It's bad enough NOW and there ARE rules that are designed to keep them in check.

This all reminds me of the whole "power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote.
 
M

Mik3y

Banned
Mar 2, 2004
7,089
0
0
Originally posted by: DJFuji
Is it just me or is ATOT kind of fascist with the moderating? Mods seem to have absolute, anonymous power, answer to nobody, and have pretty much free reign here. I can understand completely if a mod tempbans someone for an attitude problem or something (i.e. woot), but it seems like they also ban somewhat arbitrarily. If someone asks a legitimate question and is civil about it, i don't think that's grounds for a ban IMO. I dont hang out in P&N so I havent actually seen any abuse firsthand, but it's the whole "don't ever question my authority or ask about my decisions because that insolence will not be tolerated" thing that makes it feel like fascism sometimes.

IMO it'd be better if we KNEW who the mods were. The lack of anonymity usually prevents some of the "god complex" that can develop when people can anonymously punish others without beind held accoutable for their actions. It reminds me of being an NCO in the Marine Corps. I had a lot of power over my troops but they answered to me and I answered to my superiors. If word got out that I was abusive or unfair, I would have to answer for my actions. The biggest leadership problems I've seen occurred when you had a poor or unfair leader in charge of Marines who didn't have his or her own superior to report to. Thus, they had virtually absolute power and many times that would cause major problems within a unit. The only saving grace was that a) Marines rotate on a regular basis so he would never be there forever, and b) we had a system called 'request mast' which would allow any Marine to voice a legitimate complaint and it would be taken up the chain of command until it was resolved in a satisfactory manner. So if he took it to his immediate superior and his superior dismissed it, said superiod would still be required to forward it to HIS superior for further action or until it was resolved.

While ATOT is certainly not the military, it does sometimes appear to be nazi in nature. The very fact that I could be punished for posting this should be sufficient evidence. I am not being offensive, rude, or even belligerent by this post but yet I am likely to be punished for for my "insolence." It surprises me that with the number of liberal and intellectual people here, there isn't an uproar caused by this type of behavior. Imagine if police officers had that kind of power. Where you could never report an officer for anything and he was under no rules at all to be fair. It's bad enough NOW and there ARE rules that are designed to keep them in check.

This all reminds me of the whole "power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote.
Click to expand...

hey, freedom of speech isnt aloud here!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom