Originally posted by: Hacp
Btw, good to see inquirer totally go back on their word in a span of 24 hours. Downright impressive!
THe X800PRO performed very horribly compared to the 6800GT. THe GS performs EXACTLY like the GT, so its more performance.[/quote]
No it didn't! Rollo has warped your mind! Performance was actually quite close. The X800 Pro was almost neck and neck with the GT in some instances; it got smoked bad in OpenGL games like Doom3 (although later drivers would at least make it competitive), but was about a tie in D3D games like Far Cry, HL2, etc. And it was a much more solid competitor than the 6800nu.
Plus, the X800 Pro came with RAM rated for either 1Ghz or the same stuff on the X800XT (depending on if you got the VIVO version or not); most 475/900 Mhz X800 Pros could overclock easily to 525/1050 and above, making them a bit slower than a 6800 Ultra (which most GT's would clock to), but faster than the base 6800GT.
The X800Pro was underrated; it had 256MB of GDDR3 just like the X800XT and 6800GT, but it has been dissed so much that people make it sound like it was in the same class as the 6800nu. It wasn't.
The main knock on the X800 Pro was the "features" argument because it had SM2.0b, while the 6800 cards had SM 3.0. Which turned out to be all but a moot point for that generation.