• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Here We Go Again...Another House Allowed To Burn

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Good link.

I think there can be an option for the folks to pay once the house is burning to have it put out.

The trailer trash would probably just skip town or declare bankruptcy.

True, but where are we as a country when we let houses burn to the ground over $75?

WTF are we turning in to?

More like 1,000 people all rolling the dice for 10 years instead of all paying their fair share = $750,000. The one with a fire is just the sob story.

It's small government. Forcing them to buy fire fighting services (or health insurance) is librul commie talk!
 
Last edited:

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
I think there can be an option for the folks to pay once the house is burning to have it put out.

Let's do the math.

If everyone in the county or town of say 10,000 people paid the $75/year, that's $750k to support the fire department. If the fire department responds to 3 fires each year for this same town, each incident would have to be billed at $250k for the same level of services.

Do you really think people living in a mobile home will pay $250k to put out a fire in their $10k home?
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
True, but where are we as a country when we let houses burn to the ground over $75?

WTF are we turning in to?

You don't seem to understand. These people voted not to have their property taxes fund a fire dept.

The city could decide to not even offer to provide fire coverage these home owners but they do. If they're not willing to pay $75 for fire coverage, that's their choice.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
So put a lien on the (now NOT burned down) property.

What's so hard about that?

A mobile home outside of local fire department coverage is likely going to be a total loss by the time they arrive.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
You don't seem to understand. These people voted not to have their property taxes fund a fire dept.

The city could decide to not even offer to provide fire coverage these home owners but they do. If they're not willing to pay $75 for fire coverage, that's their choice.

The government has failed these people, they should have the right to opt out.. By let's say not phoning the fire department, they should not need to opt in.
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
The trailer trash would probably just skip town or declare bankruptcy.


Ya thats a possiblity. Im so tied to the idea of firefighters being paid by the state,...

True the folks not paying the fee here took the gamble and lost.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
The government has failed these people, they should have the right to opt out.. By let's say not phoning the fire department, they should not need to opt in.

Another counties gov failed them?

Their own gov did exactly what the people living there wanted them to do. They didn't create a fire department so everyone could save a few dollars each year.

Would be the same if everyone in London paid taxes to cover a fire department, then the rest of the country who doesn't pay for one complains when the London FD doesn't come rushing to put out their fires.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
I think this is the biggest problem with America, its not a country it's 50 different countries, there doesn't seem to be much national law sorting basic stuff like fire service out.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Another counties gov failed them?

Their own gov did exactly what the people living there wanted them to do. They didn't create a fire department so everyone could save a few dollars each year.

I'm talking about the government of the US A not local government.

Would be the same if everyone in London paid taxes to cover a fire department, then the rest of the country who doesn't pay for one complains when the London FD doesn't come rushing to put out their fires.

That's why we don't have to pay specific taxes for the fire departments they are sorted out of other taxes. It's not all decentralised like this.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Which leads me to my earlier question... what the fuck are they spending their tax revenues on in Tennessee?

Not sure why you don't understand. Your property taxes are local to your town/city, not the state. These folks have elected to have their property taxes not fund a fire dept, more than likely keeping their property taxes low.

Want to bet that you pay higher property taxes than these folks?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
let that be a lesson to all them Teabaggers that don't like taxes.

Don't pay your taxes? Then don't bitch when the city lets your trailer burns down.