B/c we have choice. These people choose not to have any fire coverage.
True, but where are we as a country when we let houses burn to the ground over $75?
WTF are we turning in to?
B/c we have choice. These people choose not to have any fire coverage.
Good link.
I think there can be an option for the folks to pay once the house is burning to have it put out.
True, but where are we as a country when we let houses burn to the ground over $75?
WTF are we turning in to?
The trailer trash would probably just skip town or declare bankruptcy.
I think there can be an option for the folks to pay once the house is burning to have it put out.
True, but where are we as a country when we let houses burn to the ground over $75?
WTF are we turning in to?
So put a lien on the (now NOT burned down) property.
What's so hard about that?
So put a lien on the (now NOT burned down) property.
What's so hard about that?
You don't seem to understand. These people voted not to have their property taxes fund a fire dept.
The city could decide to not even offer to provide fire coverage these home owners but they do. If they're not willing to pay $75 for fire coverage, that's their choice.
LOL, America.
The trailer trash would probably just skip town or declare bankruptcy.
Yep, I'm sure fire coverage is offered to all homes out in the outback. Another dumbass comment by you.
B/c we have choice. These people choose not to have any fire coverage.
Better than your joke of a country.
Better than your joke of a country.
The government has failed these people, they should have the right to opt out.. By let's say not phoning the fire department, they should not need to opt in.
I don't pay any "extra" to have the fire department respond if my house is on fire.
???? Maybe, b/c your elected officials have decided to have your property taxes fund a fire dept.
So many facts I could post to disprove that, but I'm not derailing this thread.
???? Maybe, b/c your elected officials have decided to have your property taxes fund a fire dept.
Another counties gov failed them?
Their own gov did exactly what the people living there wanted them to do. They didn't create a fire department so everyone could save a few dollars each year.
Would be the same if everyone in London paid taxes to cover a fire department, then the rest of the country who doesn't pay for one complains when the London FD doesn't come rushing to put out their fires.
Which leads me to my earlier question... what the fuck are they spending their tax revenues on in Tennessee?
