Hi guys,
lately I've been having a problem with this particular worm. It doesn't do any corruption or anything, which is why I've been ignoring it for a while, but McAfee Virus Scan 6.02(with the latest DAT files)keeps picking it up whenever I check my mail via Eudora. It shows up as a file called "temp.in" in Eudora\spools folder, but it cannot be deleted or cleaned when I'm checking my mail as Eudora is accessing it, and after my mail is checked the file goes away, so I have no idea how to clean it. I did a search on the web on this worm and it says that the symptoms include a file called "krm132.exe" in my Windows System folder, but I couldn't find such a file anywhere in my 4 HDD partitions. All the websites I went to pertaining to this worm didn't show any method of solving it except running the Virus software with the latest virus definitions. Well I did that and VirusScan didn't come up with anything. Please don't suggest using NAV or other virus software. I sincerely don't think it'd make a difference.
I'm using Windows 2000 Pro SP2 btw. Thanks!
lately I've been having a problem with this particular worm. It doesn't do any corruption or anything, which is why I've been ignoring it for a while, but McAfee Virus Scan 6.02(with the latest DAT files)keeps picking it up whenever I check my mail via Eudora. It shows up as a file called "temp.in" in Eudora\spools folder, but it cannot be deleted or cleaned when I'm checking my mail as Eudora is accessing it, and after my mail is checked the file goes away, so I have no idea how to clean it. I did a search on the web on this worm and it says that the symptoms include a file called "krm132.exe" in my Windows System folder, but I couldn't find such a file anywhere in my 4 HDD partitions. All the websites I went to pertaining to this worm didn't show any method of solving it except running the Virus software with the latest virus definitions. Well I did that and VirusScan didn't come up with anything. Please don't suggest using NAV or other virus software. I sincerely don't think it'd make a difference.
I'm using Windows 2000 Pro SP2 btw. Thanks!