• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Help with processor upgrade decision

bulletworm

Junior Member
Normally, I upgrade on a 2-year basis. Typically a complete upgrade (motherboard, processor, memory, and GPU). But this year as my upgrade window approaches I find myself wondering if I should semi-skip this cycle with a simple processor/memory upgrade alone. I am posting this just to make sure my head is screwed on straight and my logic is sound.

First, you should know I am a gamer. I rarely use my computer for anything else (that requires any kind of performance). I am not an overclocker, and my timetable for doing this upgrade will likely coincide with the Windows 7 release, so... approximately the end of October. And finally, I normally spend approximately $800 per upgrade.

I currently have an E6600 C2D 2.4GHz CPU with 2GB memory. My current motherboard however will support the Core 2 Quad Q9550, which seems to perform quite nicely on the latest games. Add 4 (or even 8) GB of memory I think should hold me until the Sandy Bridge processors come to life (I would think).

I have seen there are Core2Duos still outperforming the Quads in gaming, but my bet is that from here on out games will come to expect and use more cores, so I would bet that as that comes true the Core2Quads would take the lead.

Anyhow, that is a fairly inexpensive upgrade, at around $300 (at todays prices) without sweating rebates.


My other options seem to be, from what I am reading, an i7 920 or waiting to see how the i5 will pan out. Both will require a new motherboard obviously and I am guessing the upgrade would cost about $500-600.

I don't know what is up with AMD, but it sure seems like you have to scroll about half way down on the charts before you start seeing AMD processors show up... I typically go for the upper quarter of the charts for target performance, andit shocked me not to see any AMD processors there, especially since I used them religiously in the Pentium days...

So the real questions are:

- Would the i7/i5 really be worth the approximately $300/100% premium over a Q9550?

- Will the Q9550 perform well enough for gaming until we reach the Sandy Bridge gaming era?

I obviously will be upgrading video cards as well, but I've already decided that I am waiting for a DX11 variant there. Perhaps I would get an even higher-end card than I would have due to the savings from keeping the LGA775 platform though.

Thanks in advance for any input/thoughts.

worm
 
Back
Top