Help with HD involving the 48-bit addressing

kyo

Member
Oct 18, 2002
97
0
0
I got a 160GB harddrive.. and I'm not sure if my mobo supports the 48 bit addressing thingy that allow you to use HD past the 137GB barrier..
I know that Windows XP service pack 2 supports it but I'd like to find out if my mobo does too..
I have the MSI KT4V mobo with the default bios..

Also.. in case that my mobo doesn't support over 138GB, if I make two partitions (ex 80gb each) will that work?
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,001
126
The first thing I'd be doing is flashing the mobo's BIOS to the latest version.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
When you start up your computer the power-on-self-test text screens should show you what size the motherboard sees the drive as, if it's over 140 GB you are OK.

If your motherboard is missing 48-bit support, you can probably download a BIOS update from the manufacturer website to add it.
 

OCedHrt

Senior member
Oct 4, 2002
613
0
0
Also of importance, you will need to enable 48bit addressing in XP otherwise you'll lose data past the 137GB mark. This can be done by setting a registry value. Should be able to easily find this info. And there's no harm in plugging it in even if the mb doesn't support 48 bit addressing.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,204
126
MAJOR warning here - I've had some recent issues. I have an MSI K4TV-L rev. 1.0 mobo. You may or may not have the same one, they've come out with both a KT4AV and a KT4V-A board, which are different from the original KT4V-L. Anyways. There is a new BIOS out for mine, rev 1.B, with support for the new Socket-A Sempron CPUs mentioned in the readme.

I have a Promise Ultra 100 TX2 PCI IDE controller with three HDs on it, the mobo IDE controllers have four opticals. The first HD is a WD 80GB JB, second is a 160GB JB, third is a 250GB Maxtor DM+9.

To make a long story short, I went from my BIOS 1.7 to 1.B, and lost DOS/BIOS access to my 2nd/3rd HD! Not sure exactly what's going on, but I'm working on it. I suspect that the changes mentioned in the BIOS 1.9 to somehow "fix" network-boot support, is interfering with the Extended Int13h / 48-bit LBA support provided by the Promise BIOS routines, which otherwise work fine with BIOS 1.7. I believe that this issue probably manifests itself with BIOS 1.9 and all newer releases. I would stick with BIOS 1.7 or 1.8 if you are using any kind of add-on PCI IDE controller card. Unfortunately, I could use 1.A or newer, as that mentions a fix for AGP 8x Radeons, which I also have. BIOS 1.B seemed to fixed some strange possibly video-related freeze issues that I've occasionally encountered.

Unknown if this affects HDs attached to the mobo IDE ports, although I'm guessing it probably doesn't.