• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Help with dual core e4 and e6

phillyman36

Golden Member
Im looking at info on the internet and the is a e4 and e6 stepping for Amd athlon 64x2 3800 whats the difference and how can i tell which im buying? New only display 1 x2-3800 i dont know whitch one it is
 
if they dont display it, its hard to tell. you have to look on the surface of the chip. e6 have been having some problems overclocking.
 
I just finished doing some pretty intensive research on the X2 3800+

Very interesting last couple hours it was...

There are actually two different X2 3800+ out there.

One is an E4 Manchester.
The other is a less seen E6 Toledo with half the cache disabled. Most likely they are 4400+ that had half the cache fail, & were down-binned.

If you look on AMD' site, you will see that for each Manchester X2, there are two versions, the E4, & the E6.

Now more than likely, the E6 4200+ is a cache-failed 4400+, & the E6 4600+ is a cache-failed 4800+.

That why the E6 3800+ is so interesting to me.
As of the present, there is no 4000+, so the E6 3800+ has to be a cache-failed 4400+. The only downside of that is that is may also be a speed-failed 4400+, which isn't so good for us OCers.

However, it seems both E4 & E6 3800+ are hitting very nice OCs.

I think the OCing potential is higher with the E6 3800+ myself, since i'm assuming they were designed to be 4400+, which should mean a slightly higher OC.

Either way though, both E4 & E6 3800+ seem to hit 2.4GHz at the lowest, which means a free upgrade to 4600+ 🙂

Here's the links to some great info on the X2s & the different revisions:
http://balusc.xs4all.nl/Ned/har-cpu-amd-k9.php

On AMD's compare site, select X2, & more details will appear -
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/Default.aspx








Here's what i copied onto notepad for my own reference:

More detailed info from AMD.com:

Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
Model 3800+
Ordering P/N (Tray) ADA3800DAA5CD
Ordering P/N (PIB) ADA3800BVBOX
Stepping E6 - Toledo (half cache disabled)

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Details
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
Model 3800+
Ordering P/N (Tray) ADA3800DKA5BV
Ordering P/N (PIB) ADA3800BVBOX
Stepping E4 - Manchester



Detailed info from The BalusC Server:

X2 3800+ Toledo
OEM: ADA3800DAA5CD
BOXED: ADA3800CDBOX

X2 3800+ Manchester
OEM: ADA3800DAA5BV
BOXED: ADA3800BVBOX


 
Heh, I dont think it makes a difference other than the fact that they're different batches. There are E4 4600+ and 4200+ so both "core revisions" are have the same clockspeed targets.
 
Back
Top