I've had a terrible time trying to find information on Windows Server 2003. I was going to buy a Dell with SBS 2003 and I tried to ask the Dell rep a few questions, and he told me to ask microsoft. I spent hours on the microsoft site trying to figure how to contact them and I never did.
Anyway, I'm in a small office of about 8 people. Right now we all have computers and are networked using basic windows networking. We don't need a mail server. We don't need a SQL server. The only thing we need is a file server so that we can back people up, because we have had problems recently with people's HDs crashing and they don't all have CDRW drives.
I'm extremely worried that we will spend money on Small Business Server 2003 and not get enough "CALs" and it would alienate people from being able to get on the network. Is that a fair worry? Right now everyone is connected to our network, but I read that SBS 2003 requires itself to be the domain controller, so in order for people to get on the network they would need to connect to the server, which means I'd have to have lots of CALs. Sure, 10 CALs would be enough for now, but what about when visitors bring their laptops in? And I'd be paying an extra $500 for every 5 pack of CALS just so that people could share files, when they can do that for free right now anyway. Since I don't need Exchange or SQL Server, SBS 2003 is sounding worse and worse.
I noticed that Windows Server 2003 standard costs a little more up front, but the CALs seem to cost less. Does anyone know if it requires itself to be on a domain?
Another option is Windows Storage Server, which doesn't need CALs. Does anyone know if it will work on my current network?
Thanks for any advice you guys can give me.
- SuperShaz
Anyway, I'm in a small office of about 8 people. Right now we all have computers and are networked using basic windows networking. We don't need a mail server. We don't need a SQL server. The only thing we need is a file server so that we can back people up, because we have had problems recently with people's HDs crashing and they don't all have CDRW drives.
I'm extremely worried that we will spend money on Small Business Server 2003 and not get enough "CALs" and it would alienate people from being able to get on the network. Is that a fair worry? Right now everyone is connected to our network, but I read that SBS 2003 requires itself to be the domain controller, so in order for people to get on the network they would need to connect to the server, which means I'd have to have lots of CALs. Sure, 10 CALs would be enough for now, but what about when visitors bring their laptops in? And I'd be paying an extra $500 for every 5 pack of CALS just so that people could share files, when they can do that for free right now anyway. Since I don't need Exchange or SQL Server, SBS 2003 is sounding worse and worse.
I noticed that Windows Server 2003 standard costs a little more up front, but the CALs seem to cost less. Does anyone know if it requires itself to be on a domain?
Another option is Windows Storage Server, which doesn't need CALs. Does anyone know if it will work on my current network?
Thanks for any advice you guys can give me.
- SuperShaz