Help: Please critique my webpage. Oh come on, you do it for everyone else that asks....

[notfred]

Click on this link.

Then, follow the directions in bold type.

Then tell me whether or not the operation of the page seems intutive.

Thanks

 

[notfred]

please?

 

[CrazyDe1]

Looks good to me....use verdana font tho, I guess thats industry standard..not much there though heh

 

[SWirth86]

Looks fine.

btw, 'Intuitive' instead of 'Intutive'

 

[notfred]

I was asking about the OPERATION of the site, not the design. Did you read the instructions?

 

[Brutuskend]

You should try bracket racing..

 

[Pastore]

Need to work on your RT there bud

 

[piku]

1.2 second reaction time? Were you sleeping or something?

Seriously though, it looks nice. Nice design.

 

[SWirth86]

Originally posted by: notfred
I was asking about the OPERATION of the site, not the design. Did you read the instructions?

Works fine too. Easy to use=Good

How can your reaction times vary by .6 seconds?

 

[notfred]

I've been more concerned w/ 60ft and ET than reaction time, usually

 

[MrCodeDude]

Looks cool.
-- mrcodedude

 

[dukdukgoos]

Gives an error on the MPH sort. Everything else ok.

 

[XCLAN]

goin for the twelves i see?

 

[notfred]

Originally posted by: dukdukgoos
Gives an error on the MPH sort. Everything else ok.

Try it again, I broke the script for 1 second, but it's fixed now.

Also: did anyone notice that clicking on a red arrow would reverse the sorting order? Should I state that explicitly?

 

[IcemanJer]

mmm..... it's slow......
you can use DHTML to do the sort locally, instead of making another trip to the server.

 

[T2T III]

Also: did anyone notice that clicking on a red arrow would reverse the sorting order?

Yes, I did. Nice work on the table!

 

[Evadman]

Man, you need help with you RT's 1.2 seconds is like waiting for the other guy to pass the 60' line

The tables work cool, very nice