Help me with a simple physics question

Lizabath

Member
Jun 4, 2004
125
0
0
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal
 

AgentEL

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,327
0
0
Assuming no air resistance, what forces are acting on the ball? If you know the force(s), you will know the direction.
 

jyates

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
3,847
0
76
I'll take a stab and say "down" ......

Assuming that you have gravity that is.... :)
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,201
4,871
126
There is only one force, and thus the acceleration is the same no matter what point the ball is at. The answer doesn't change whether it is at its highest point or not.
 

notfred

Lifer
Feb 12, 2001
38,241
4
0
B. It's always B, regardless of the point in it's flight path (unless it's still in the pitcher's hand).
 

Lizabath

Member
Jun 4, 2004
125
0
0
Originally posted by: AgentEL
Assuming no air resistance, what forces are acting on the ball? If you know the force(s), you will know the direction.

exactly.

I got it now.

Only one vector of force is acting on the ball, not two.

Thus the answer have to be Down. Acceleration -9.8 m/s^2 from gravity.
 

ActuaryTm

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2003
6,858
12
81
Originally posted by: AgentEL
Assuming no air resistance, what forces are acting on the ball? If you know the force(s), you will know the direction of the acceleration.
With the inclusion of the portion added above, follow this advice.
 

JonnyStarks

Golden Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,682
0
0
break it down into horizontal motion and vertical motion
at the top of its flight, its not moving up or down.
however, it is still moving horizontally. I guess technically you've already applied the force, but its velocity would be only horizontal.
or something like that... im tired right now
 

JonnyStarks

Golden Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,682
0
0
Originally posted by: Lizabath
Originally posted by: AgentEL
Assuming no air resistance, what forces are acting on the ball? If you know the force(s), you will know the direction.

exactly.

I got it now.

Only one vector of force is acting on the ball, not two.

Thus the answer have to be Down. Acceleration -9.8 m/s^2 from gravity.


Yeah, that sounds better
 

JDub02

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2002
6,209
1
0
Originally posted by: notfred
B. It's always B, regardless of the point in it's flight path (unless it's still in the pitcher's hand).

yep. the force of gravity is constant from the time it leaves the guy's hand. assuming no air resistance, there are no other forces acting on the ball.
 

Peetoeng

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2000
1,866
0
0
Originally posted by: Lizabath
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal

c. but the 'no air resistance' makes the problem unrealistic. Ball leaves the pitcher's hand with an initial acceleration (in x, y, z direction). The z-component of acceleration decreases due to gravity; at the highest point, the ball's z-acceleration is zero. But since 'no air resistance' is assumed, the ball would maintain its initial x- and y- acceleration which is obscure. Nothing stops the ball until it hits the ground or a fan's head.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: JDub02
Originally posted by: notfred
B. It's always B, regardless of the point in it's flight path (unless it's still in the pitcher's hand).

yep. the force of gravity is constant from the time it leaves the guy's hand. assuming no air resistance, there are no other forces acting on the ball.

3rd ed
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
Originally posted by: Peetoeng
Originally posted by: Lizabath
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal

c. but the 'no air resistance' makes the problem unrealistic. Ball leaves the pitcher's hand with an initial acceleration (in x, y, z direction). The z-component of acceleration decreases due to gravity; at the highest point, the ball's z-acceleration is zero. But since 'no air resistance' is assumed, the ball would maintain its initial x- and y- acceleration which is obscure. Nothing stops the ball until it hits the ground or a fan's head.

boo yah!
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: Peetoeng
Originally posted by: Lizabath
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal

c. but the 'no air resistance' makes the problem unrealistic. Ball leaves the pitcher's hand with an initial acceleration (in x, y, z direction). The z-component of acceleration decreases due to gravity; at the highest point, the ball's z-acceleration is zero. But since 'no air resistance' is assumed, the ball would maintain its initial x- and y- acceleration which is obscure. Nothing stops the ball until it hits the ground or a fan's head.

Lot's of physics failures in the thread today.

Clarification: I'm talking about you. Oh, and maziwanka now it seems.
 
Nov 7, 2000
16,403
3
81
from the instant the ball leaves the hand, there is NO FORCE OTHER THAN GRAVITY acting on the ball. The horizontal speed (nor direction) is not changing (ie no acceleration) (there is no force in that dimension). The answer is B, and it is for the entire duration of the flight (not just the apex). The answer has been posted already I know, but there are also some wrong answers so I thought I would reiterate.

edit to clarify a little more -
the downward acceleration causes the balls vertical velocity to slow down on its way up, and increase on the way down. in both instances the direction of the acceleration is downward. also the ball is assumed to be travelling at a constant velocity after being launched from the hand.
 

Heisenberg

Lifer
Dec 21, 2001
10,621
1
0
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Peetoeng
Originally posted by: Lizabath
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal

c. but the 'no air resistance' makes the problem unrealistic. Ball leaves the pitcher's hand with an initial acceleration (in x, y, z direction). The z-component of acceleration decreases due to gravity; at the highest point, the ball's z-acceleration is zero. But since 'no air resistance' is assumed, the ball would maintain its initial x- and y- acceleration which is obscure. Nothing stops the ball until it hits the ground or a fan's head.

Lot's of physics failures in the thread today.

Clarification: I'm talking about you. Oh, and maziwanka now it seems.
Beat me to it.
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Peetoeng
Originally posted by: Lizabath
A baseball player throws a ball from left field toward home plate. Assume no air resistance, at the instant the ball reaches the highest point, what is the direction of the ball's acceleration? Why?

possible answers:
a. Up
b. Down
c. Horizontal

c. but the 'no air resistance' makes the problem unrealistic. Ball leaves the pitcher's hand with an initial acceleration (in x, y, z direction). The z-component of acceleration decreases due to gravity; at the highest point, the ball's z-acceleration is zero. But since 'no air resistance' is assumed, the ball would maintain its initial x- and y- acceleration which is obscure. Nothing stops the ball until it hits the ground or a fan's head.

Lot's of physics failures in the thread today.

Clarification: I'm talking about you. Oh, and maziwanka now it seems.

i was wrong. its clearly b.

 

Titan

Golden Member
Oct 15, 1999
1,819
0
0
Tanswer is definitely not C. I'm glad to see i'm not the only one who got an A in physics in the thread.

Based on canonical assumptions, the answer is B (down). But the question gives a poor image in describing the reference frame. In the proper frame of reference, any of the answers could be true. The question really needs to establish a clear frame of direction before it can be answered fully.