It actually plays zero role in top speed, at least once you remove any impact on rolling resistance (which would increase as weight does). It's all about aerodynamics.
I don't know the specific math of what it would take an S2k to hit 180 mph but if his car really has that much horsepower it's probably not far off.
Stock car does about 149 according to a link I found with 237 horsepower, so doubling that I think 180 sounds pretty doable.
It actually plays zero role in top speed,...
I had a hard time believing him because he also told me a 400hp civic can do low 8's. 1/4
Would that car even be stable enough to drive safely at that speed?
Weight is irrelevant but why wouldn't it do 180mph? 450hp is a lot of horsepower and Civics are very aerodynamic.
But I'm guessing his tires aren't rated for that speed, and the aerodynamics will make it dangerous. No, a wing on the trunk doesn't help!
Hard to say. Probably not. The problem is usually rear downforce. The front usually has a pretty decent amount just because of the hood slope. Most cars at that speed form a suction as the air flow lifts off the rear window (Bernoulli number, no longer laminar flow, etc...).
The '04 era Mustangs are limited to the speed they are exactly because of that reason.
V-TEC, anything is possible, crate motor from Japan [overnighted], double-clutching, beef the welds on the manifold etc. it might happen!I had a hard time believing him because he also told me a 400hp civic can do low 8's. 1/4
beef the welds on the manifold
V-TEC, anything is possible, crate motor from Japan [overnighted], double-clutching, beef the welds on the manifold etc. it might happen!
In truth can a FWD on the planet even do 8's? Obviously it would need literally magnitudes more than 400 horsepower, but I question whether it could get the traction. A 1000 HP bugatti veyron with AWD does 1/4 in 10 flat.
Um... actually a wing on the trunk DOES help.
Um... actually a wing on the trunk DOES help.