Help me pick the right logo............POLL

[theNEOone]

I'm making up a logo for my research lab at school. Lemme know which one you like best.

one
two
three
four
five
six
seven

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Methinks two kicks butt.

 

[iwearnosox]

My cells are divided on this one.

 

[Entity]

Originally posted by: iwearnosox
My cells are divided on this one.

You are just a source of never-ending puns, aren't you?

2 is cool, but not really "schoolish." I voted 6.

Rob

 

[Sluggo]

I liked 5 the best.

Clean and professional looking.

 

[rgwalt]

I'm torn between 4 and 5. I voted 5, but I think both are equally good.

1- Too many black lines in the background.
2- Very cool, but not appropriate for a school logo
3- The DNA makes it look like the logo says MOYBEL. The design just doesn't do it for me.
4- Simple and to the point. It rocks
5- More "complex" but still clean and professional. Also rocks.
6- Too much "bounce" for a school logo. Almost looks silly.
7- Clean, except for the "torn" look of the fonts. Also not professional enough for a school logo.

Ryan

 

[rgwalt]

Originally posted by: Sluggo
I liked 5 the best.

Clean and professional looking.

I swear I didn't read his post before I posted. Dammit sluggo!

Ryan

 

[iwearnosox]

Isn't mobel the name of the jewish guy that circumsizes you?

 

[ElFenix]

4 and 5 are the most professional looking

 

[Wolfsraider]

Originally posted by: Sluggo
I liked 5 the best.

Clean and professional looking.

same here

 

[VBboy]

Most of them have various effects which really distract from reading the logo itself. A logo needs to be clean and simple; it is not a demonstration of one's imagination and 3d skillz. Plain and simple logo are much more memorable (the blue Dell, the sliced IBM, the Apple's apple).

Also, text itself needs to be readable, and on many of those logos colors are not very well contrasted and fonts are somewhat... not ideal

Sorry, hope this works as constructive criticism for you.

I guess the first one, but the several words under the main text are pretty hard to read... Maybe you could change the font?

 

[xboxist]

The two that I liked the best are currently the top-2 vote getters.

 

[theNEOone]

Originally posted by: VBboy
Most of them have various effects which really distract from reading the logo itself. A logo needs to be clean and simple; it is not a demonstration of one's imagination and 3d skillz. Plain and simple logo are much more memorable (the blue Dell, the sliced IBM, the Apple's apple).

Also, text itself needs to be readable, and on many of those logos colors are not very well contrasted and fonts are somewhat... not ideal

Sorry, hope this works as constructive criticism for you.

I guess the first one, but the several words under the main text are pretty hard to read... Maybe you could change the font?

from this remark and others, it seems that i slightly missed the mark in designing my logos. back to the drawing board in hopes of designing a cleaner logo.

thanks for the tips guys

 

[Bignate603]

I think 5 looks the most professional.

 

[CanOWorms]

I like 5... the others look like they belong on some gaming website or something

 

[amdskip]

5 looks the best to me.

 

[DrumminBoy]

Originally posted by: amdskip
5 looks the best to me.

agreed

 

[zippy]

Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Isn't mobel the name of the jewish guy that circumsizes you?

No, that mohel (pronounced moyle). <shudder>

Anyway, considering it's Cornell, I voted #2. In fact, before I realized it was for Cornell but had seen #2 I thought, "Hmm, that would be nice if it was for Cornell."

I'll be there next year!