I'm looking at G-Skill ram;
DDR500 3-4-4-8 or DDR400 2-3-2-5.
If price is a determining factor then the DDR400 is better but will it give my higher overclocking? The problem I have, is my board will have to use either 166 or 133 memory divider to try to get to 3000MHz. At the moment my Corsair Value ram is running at 208MHz on 166. Ideally I'd like to run it with this divider and run the ram at 250(though this is not a prequisite). I'm afraid that If I run the memory with 133 it wont cold boot as this is the problem I'm experiencing at the moment, which could be a factor with the Corsair ram.
DDR500 is rated to run at 250MHz right? But with better ram the DDR400 should also be capable of running at 250?
Not knowing enough about ram and what spec's are required I guess this is as much a learning experiencing as anything else. At the end of the day I could hit a bottleneck with the CPU too.
I hope I gain some knowledge through your input to help me make an informed decision. TIA.
HT 3
FSB 300
mem divider 166
here are the ram specs
DDR400
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 2-3-2-5 (PC3200)
Test Voltage : 2.6~2.75 V
PCB Board : 6 Layer Brain Power 6U808 PCB
Speed : DDR400 (PC3200)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment
DDR 500
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 3-4-4-8 (PC4000)
Test Voltage : 2.6~2.8 V
PCB Board : 6 Layers PCB
Speed : DDR500MHz (PC4000)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment
Here's another DDR400 with Samsung UCCC
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 2.5-3-3-6 (PC3200)
Test Voltage : 2.5~2.7 V
PCB Board : 6 Layers PCB
Speed : DDR400MHz (PC3200)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment
DDR500 3-4-4-8 or DDR400 2-3-2-5.
If price is a determining factor then the DDR400 is better but will it give my higher overclocking? The problem I have, is my board will have to use either 166 or 133 memory divider to try to get to 3000MHz. At the moment my Corsair Value ram is running at 208MHz on 166. Ideally I'd like to run it with this divider and run the ram at 250(though this is not a prequisite). I'm afraid that If I run the memory with 133 it wont cold boot as this is the problem I'm experiencing at the moment, which could be a factor with the Corsair ram.
DDR500 is rated to run at 250MHz right? But with better ram the DDR400 should also be capable of running at 250?
Not knowing enough about ram and what spec's are required I guess this is as much a learning experiencing as anything else. At the end of the day I could hit a bottleneck with the CPU too.
I hope I gain some knowledge through your input to help me make an informed decision. TIA.
HT 3
FSB 300
mem divider 166
here are the ram specs
DDR400
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 2-3-2-5 (PC3200)
Test Voltage : 2.6~2.75 V
PCB Board : 6 Layer Brain Power 6U808 PCB
Speed : DDR400 (PC3200)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment
DDR 500
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 3-4-4-8 (PC4000)
Test Voltage : 2.6~2.8 V
PCB Board : 6 Layers PCB
Speed : DDR500MHz (PC4000)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment
Here's another DDR400 with Samsung UCCC
Package : 2048MB kit (2x1024MB) dual channel pack
CAS Latency : 2.5-3-3-6 (PC3200)
Test Voltage : 2.5~2.7 V
PCB Board : 6 Layers PCB
Speed : DDR400MHz (PC3200)
Type : 184-pin DDR SDRAM
Error Checking : Non-ECC
Registered/Unbuffered : Unbuffered
Quality Control : Comprehensively tested in pairs in a dual channel environment