Help. I'm receiving death threats on the P&N forum!

[WhipperSnapper]

Moderators help please. I think I'm receiving death threats in a P&N discussion from JohnOfSheffield. Maybe he's just drunk, I dunno.

The thread is: "Texas Rape Survivors Billed for Rape Kits".

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper

Originally posted by: Carmen813Something like 1/4 to 1/2 of all college woman meet the legal definition of having been raped during their college career. It's just disturbing.

My understanding of the situation is that Marxist-Feminists have defined rape to be so broad that it ends up encompassing huge amounts of women who haven't been raped resulting in that obviously bogus stat. There's even a professor of law who once infamously said "all sex is rape."

If a woman is a little bit drunk and consents to sex, is that rape? If a woman consents to sex and then feels badly about it later, is that rape? If a guy lies to a woman and tells her that he's a movie star and she consents to sex, is that rape?

The bogus claim that most women are victims of rape along with the bogus claim that women aren't paid the same for equal work is just part of the too often unrecognized war our society is waging against males. To learn more, read the books "The Myth of Male Power" and "Why Men Earn More" (they work longer and harder at less pleasant and less safe jobs) by former NOW board member and male feminist-turned men's rights advocate Warren Farrell.

A no is a no and doing what you probably do, get them drunk enough to pass out so you can rape them is also rape.

I wouldn't mind meeting you in a dark alley, i would gut you like the fucking swine you are.

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper

What does "peer reviewed" mean exactly? "Peer reviewed" by Marxist Feminists and/or Gender Feminists from the Women's Studies curriculum who will rubber stamp anything that advocates a viewpoint that they find to be desirable? "Peer review" sounds haughty but in actuality it's only as good as the "peers" doing the "review".

Peer reviewed means reviewed by fellow scientists for errors, it has held up to scrutiny of others.

I wouldn't mind putting my 870 in your mouth and pull the trigger, the likes of you are not needed on this earth.

Talibans, you, same fucking pieces of shit and i have no problem with all of you dying and i would take pleasure in it if it was by my hand.

The lot of you deserve it.

The situation has been dealt with.

Anandtech Senior Moderator
Red Dawn

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

For someone who says that if a woman says no you just have to be persistant to have sex with it you have a lot of fucking nerve.

I can promise you that there are not many people who will sympathise with you after that.

And i never made a death threat, i just said that i wouldn't mind putting a bullet in the heads of you and the likes of you, you know, the kind that think that women saying no is just a sign for you to be more persistant.

"The problem is that many women say "no" when they really don't mean it and many men have learned to be persistent."

Is the exact quote from your disgusting piece of shit arse.

 

[newnameman]

I don't see the issue, issuing death threats to other members is par for the course in P&N.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: newnameman
I don't see the issue, issuing death threats to other members is par for the course in P&N.

When someone says that commiting the felony of rape (if she says no and you are persistant as he suggests, you are actually guilty of rape, PERIOD) is all good and i have a young daughter, i kinda get pissed off at that person.

Someone will kill him when they find him in bed with their daughter kicking and screaming to get loose, but that person will not be me.

 

[Nik]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: newnameman
I don't see the issue, issuing death threats to other members is par for the course in P&N.

When someone says that commiting the felony of rape (if she says no and you are persistant as he suggests, you are actually guilty of rape, PERIOD) is all good and i have a young daughter, i kinda get pissed off at that person.

Actually, rape requires sex without concent. What, exactly, is he suggesting you persist in? He never said anything about raping women. You're severely overreacting. Persit = continue. Persist != rape. To persist would be to continue to do something you're already doing. If persist = rape, you would have to already be raping her.

Persist as in persuing them in conversation until she finally admits that you're gorgeous and she wants to jump your bones but doesn't want to come off like a slut saying yes the first time? That's probably what he meant.

Someone will kill him when they find him in bed with their daughter kicking and screaming to get loose, but that person will not be me.

You need to just calm down, STFU, and probably unplug. You and your little army avatar show an aggressive personality disorder and that can be extremely dangerous when paired with a lack of reading comprehension or logical thought process. I wouldn't want to meet you in a dark alley not because I'm scared of you because I raped your sister, but because the simplest thing I say may be twisted and used to fuel your obvious inner troubles and I'm afraid I would be the victim of your lunacy for no reason.

STFU. GTFO.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: newnameman
I don't see the issue, issuing death threats to other members is par for the course in P&N.

When someone says that commiting the felony of rape (if she says no and you are persistant as he suggests, you are actually guilty of rape, PERIOD) is all good and i have a young daughter, i kinda get pissed off at that person.

Actually, rape requires sex without concent. What, exactly, is he suggesting you persist in? He never said anything about raping women. You're severely overreacting. Persit = continue. Persist != rape. To persist would be to continue to do something you're already doing. If persist = rape, you would have to already be raping her.

Persist as in persuing them in conversation until she finally admits that you're gorgeous and she wants to jump your bones but doesn't want to come off like a slut saying yes the first time? That's probably what he meant.

Someone will kill him when they find him in bed with their daughter kicking and screaming to get loose, but that person will not be me.

You need to just calm down, STFU, and probably unplug. You and your little army avatar show an aggressive personality disorder and that can be extremely dangerous when paired with a lack of reading comprehension or logical thought process. I wouldn't want to meet you in a dark alley not because I'm scared of you because I raped your sister, but because the simplest thing I say may be twisted and used to fuel your obvious inner troubles and I'm afraid I would be the victim of your lunacy for no reason.

STFU. GTFO.

Go away you stupid twat, if you can't understand simple concepts as "no" and "persisting" then what is the use of even having this discussion.

I have no lunacy, but i do have a deep hatred of people who hurt others, ESPECIALLY women and even more young women who don't really know what they should do.

I've seen too much of that here in Afghanistan and in Pakistan, i don't need twats from the western world who thinks a "no" isn't a "no" because it's ALWAYS a NO.

Are we clear?

 

[CKent]

See this thread for a similar issue. In essence you need to just ignore it. JohnOfSheffield is a fucking idiot anyway. Hopefully vbulletin will have an ignore feature.

 

[Nik]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Go away you stupid twat, if you can't understand simple concepts as "no" and "persisting" then what is the use of even having this discussion.

I have no lunacy, but i do have a deep hatred of people who hurt others, ESPECIALLY women and even more young women who don't really know what they should do.

I've seen too much of that here in Afghanistan and in Pakistan, i don't need twats from the western world who thinks a "no" isn't a "no" because it's ALWAYS a NO.

Are we clear?

Are we clear? HAHAHAHA. Oh god, that's comedy gold.

"What we have here is ourselves on the 10 yard line, folks. When we're on the 5 yard line, you're gonna need mah rangers, hooah?" :laugh:

All I hear is "blah blah blah hate anger blah blah the word persist is legally defined as rape blah blah I am an idiot blah blah I have no reasoning skills blah blah I'm a dumb grunt with no real skills blah blah violence and rage blah blah I have a tiny penis and something to prove to my daddy blah blah blah"

Persisting in conversation isn't hurting anyone.

Stop projecting. Just because you've seen someone do something bad to a woman doesn't mean anyone and everyone who speaks to a woman who isn't sexually attracted to that speaking person IS RAPING THEM OH MY GOD RAAAAAAPE OHHHHHHHH NOES THE HUMANITY OF IT ALL.

:roll:

Get a fucking grip.

Women in the western world are different from the eastern world. Women here play mind games and lie. Some of them will tell you no because they don't want to seem like a whore in saying "yes, please, let's fuck" the first time you ask them but they really do want you to persue them. If you don't understand this concept, that must mean you're a virgin. It's okay to be a virgin, you shouldn't feel ashamed.

Nobody's saying anything about rape. Really, shut the fuck up and get back to your watch duty, you trolling grunt.

 

[MotF Bane]

It's JOS, what do you expect?

 

[Newbian]

It's a good day when there are more flame posts here in PFI then in OT.

 

[Agentbolt]

edit: Way over the top.

 

[newnameman]

Originally posted by: Agentbolt
John's just grouchy because someone raped his ugly, stupid wife. Isn't he? He's just a little sourpuss, yes he is! Yes he is!

Uhhhh...

 

[Agentbolt]

Originally posted by: newnameman

Originally posted by: Agentbolt
John's just grouchy because someone raped his ugly, stupid wife. Isn't he? He's just a little sourpuss, yes he is! Yes he is!

Uhhhh...

Oh whatever, it's exactly what he wants. I'll get banned for that comment, naturally, but this is how most JOS threads go. He gets more and more insane with his rhetoric, until someone fights fire with fire and says something over the top, then John Boy threatens to kill them. It's pretty standard fare.

 

[MmmSkyscraper]

If AT merged P&N and Video, the resulting emo tears and childish meltdowns would destroy the internet.

 

[Red Irish]

Originally posted by: Agentbolt
John's just grouchy because someone raped his ugly, stupid wife. Isn't he? He's just a little sourpuss, yes he is! Yes he is!

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no call for a comment like this.

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

Originally posted by: Red Irish

Originally posted by: Agentbolt
John's just grouchy because someone raped his ugly, stupid wife. Isn't he? He's just a little sourpuss, yes he is! Yes he is!

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no call for a comment like this.

Uhh yeah, that's way over the top.

 

[Agentbolt]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: Red Irish

Originally posted by: Agentbolt
John's just grouchy because someone raped his ugly, stupid wife. Isn't he? He's just a little sourpuss, yes he is! Yes he is!

I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no call for a comment like this.

Uhh yeah, that's way over the top.

Again, that was kind of the point. But, anyways, probably made it too strong. I'll edit it out.

 

[Number1]

I think anybody making this kind of comments toward the president would be immediately banned and his name forwarded to the FBI.

Why should comments like this be permitted at all against anybody?

Way over the line.

 

[Fern]

The matter has been handled.

Fern
P&N Moderator