I'm looking for a mobo to build a system (for my parents), which will be doing no home theater/video playback, but will have some gaming (ie. FSX), and I plan to add a dedicated graphics card now or later anyway. I also wanted native eSATA.
I was looking at the GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H and Sempron 140 combo on Newegg and was wondering if there's a cheaper (or better for around the same price) alternative. Plus I have to pay tax with Newegg, so that's another $9.25.
If the GA-MA785GM-US2H is an AM3 board, why is DDR3 not supported? Isn't that the point of being AM3 compatible? Since DDR3 isn't supported, and I won't be doing and home theater stuff, is there a good reason to get it or an ASUS AM3 (like the ASUS M4A78 series) vs. one that's just AM2 (ASUS M3A78 series)?
Also, if not doing any HT/video stuff, is there any other reason to get a 785G, vs. a 780G and 770? Each each new gen of these chipsets also all around faster? And since I prefer a Geforce over a Radeon, how do those chipsets compare otherwise (including compatibility, stability, ease of setup) to a Geforce 8300 or 8200 chipset?
I guess right now maybe it's best to go with DDR2 support, since it's (if only DDR2-800) cheapest now, but with AM3 processor support for a future upgrade? The GA-MA785GM-US2H fits this.
But I've also looked at ASUS, since it seems a lot of people use them, and they also have some older AM2/AM3 boards with eSATA, so with being older, and widely used, can be found on ebay cheaper. Then if going that route, I could spend the money saved on an Athlon II X2 and not worry about a possibly flaky unlocked 2nd core. Newegg reviews for the ASUS mobo's aren't real good though. Some forum posts mention problems too. And their RMA process is a joke. Not sure about Gigabyte.
There's also the MSI 785GM-E65 AM3 board, but I haven't really looked into yet, and it's a little more expensive and takes DDR3 only(?). I don't want an ESC or Jetway.
I was looking at the GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H and Sempron 140 combo on Newegg and was wondering if there's a cheaper (or better for around the same price) alternative. Plus I have to pay tax with Newegg, so that's another $9.25.
If the GA-MA785GM-US2H is an AM3 board, why is DDR3 not supported? Isn't that the point of being AM3 compatible? Since DDR3 isn't supported, and I won't be doing and home theater stuff, is there a good reason to get it or an ASUS AM3 (like the ASUS M4A78 series) vs. one that's just AM2 (ASUS M3A78 series)?
Also, if not doing any HT/video stuff, is there any other reason to get a 785G, vs. a 780G and 770? Each each new gen of these chipsets also all around faster? And since I prefer a Geforce over a Radeon, how do those chipsets compare otherwise (including compatibility, stability, ease of setup) to a Geforce 8300 or 8200 chipset?
I guess right now maybe it's best to go with DDR2 support, since it's (if only DDR2-800) cheapest now, but with AM3 processor support for a future upgrade? The GA-MA785GM-US2H fits this.
But I've also looked at ASUS, since it seems a lot of people use them, and they also have some older AM2/AM3 boards with eSATA, so with being older, and widely used, can be found on ebay cheaper. Then if going that route, I could spend the money saved on an Athlon II X2 and not worry about a possibly flaky unlocked 2nd core. Newegg reviews for the ASUS mobo's aren't real good though. Some forum posts mention problems too. And their RMA process is a joke. Not sure about Gigabyte.
There's also the MSI 785GM-E65 AM3 board, but I haven't really looked into yet, and it's a little more expensive and takes DDR3 only(?). I don't want an ESC or Jetway.