btw Anyone who saw that my thread about how some FoxNews announces said under the right circumstans gas could go as low as .35 cents a gallon got locked with the stipulation that it would re-opened if I could show a link SHOULD KNOW THAT I DID SEND THE MOD THE LINK. THEN THE MOD DECIDED THAT HE WOULDN'T REOPEN THE THREAD ANYWAY.
SO, here is just some of the documentation:
http://www.americanprogress.or...s/2004/07/b122948.html
Murdoch has acknowledged his major rationale for supporting the Iraq invasion: oil. While both American and British politicians strenuously deny the significance of oil in the war, the Guardian of London notes, "Murdoch wasn't so reticent.
He believes that deposing the Iraqi leader would lead to cheaper oil." Murdoch said before the war, "The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy...would be $20 a barrel for oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country." He buttressed this statement when he later said, "Once [Iraq] is behind us, the whole world will benefit from cheaper oil which will be a bigger stimulus than anything else." [Guardian, 2/17/03]
That in itself doesn't prove Fox said .35 a gallon oil, which they did by various of thier "newspeople" but it certainly lets you know that Murdoch himself saw 20 a barrel oil, which certainly would indicate that my claim that some commentators said .35 cents a gallon gas was possible under the right cirucmstances.
Where's my M*F*CKIN" OIL????
Facebook
Twitter