Hello, my name is 2.7ghz Brisbane 3600.

montypythizzle

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,699
0
71
Brisbane 3600
This is with the ~80$ G.Skill DDR2 800 w/ DDR2 667 divider @2V
Stock Voltage for the CPU
HTT X at 3X
Gigabyte M61P-S3 AM2
65nm 65W FTFW
Arctic Cooling Alpine 7 cooler
 

BitByBit

Senior member
Jan 2, 2005
473
2
81
Your HTT multiplier does not need to be that high, especially if you're overclocking. Lowering it to 2 will have no discernable impact on performance and may allow you to push your chip even further. However, 2.7GHz from a 1.9GHz K8 is respectable.
 

montypythizzle

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,699
0
71
Originally posted by: BitByBit
Your HTT multiplier does not need to be that high, especially if you're overclocking. Lowering it to 2 will have no discernable impact on performance and may allow you to push your chip even further. However, 2.7GHz from a 1.9GHz K8 is respectable.

1000 is stock, I started hitting a wall with 4X at ~1100
I believe I can get this higher but am happy with the results as is.
 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
err, the normal HTT is around 1000mhz, 5*200. So what's wrong with 3*300 or even less, and why would it hold his OC down?
 

BitByBit

Senior member
Jan 2, 2005
473
2
81
At his current clock speed it doesn't matter. My point is that if he wants to go beyond that, lowering the multiplier will ensure the HTT bus doesn't become a hindrance.
 

f4phantom2500

Platinum Member
Dec 3, 2006
2,284
1
0
Originally posted by: BitByBit
At his current clock speed it doesn't matter. My point is that if he wants to go beyond that, lowering the multiplier will ensure the HTT bus doesn't become a hindrance.

assuming he's using the default 9.5x multi, his htt should be ~850, so there's still some headroom; he could go another 50MHz on the FSB (475MHz additional OC on CPU, 3.175GHz) and would then just be at the default 1000MHz speed of the HTT bus.